Jump to content

Talk:Kipchaks in Georgia

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good articleKipchaks in Georgia was one of the History good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 15, 2006Good article nomineeListed
September 6, 2008Good article reassessmentDelisted
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on March 15, 2006.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that several Turkic nomads of the Kipchak clan settled in Georgia in 1118 and served in the Georgian military ranks for nearly two centuries?
Current status: Delisted good article

Cumans AND Kipchaks

[edit]

Why are the Cumans not mentioned here at all. They, with the Kipchaks, formed a confederation and lived together but were two different tribes who came from different places - this is clearly explained in the book Cumans and Tatars (in it, it is written that many medievel historians have said they were completely different people with different origins). This must not get confused, and the article must get altered to include the Cumans. In this article - we dont know if the "Kipchaks" were Cuman only, Kipchak only, or both. This is because they lived together (with possible exchanges or fusing of cultures, weoponry language etc). This is explained in the Cuman people page (Wikipedia). The name of the article must also get changed to Kipchaks/Cumans in Georgia or Kipchaks - Cumans in Georgia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.133.46.232 (talk) 21:43, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kipchaks in Georgia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:55, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]