Talk:Kuiper Airborne Observatory

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion not met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Astronomy Mid‑importance

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Government

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government.

Replacement?

Wasn't there an earlier observatory that crashed sometime in the '70s and Kuiper was a replacement for it? CFLeon (talk) 20:46, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've got some information on this: The original was the Galileo Observatory, a Convair CV-990 that was used by NASA from 1965 to 1973, when it collided during landing approach with a Lockheed P-3 Orion at NAS Moffett Field. CFLeon (talk) 08:07, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Now noted in article, with footnote. NASA replaced the Galileo with another Convair CV-990, dubbed "Galileo II", but it wasn't used much, as the Kuiper Airborne Observatory was operational by then. —Quicksilver^{T @} 01:12, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Can we get some more information about the earlier Galileo Observatory? Such as date of crash, number of people in crew, etc.? CFLeon (talk) 05:14, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Details?

I'm fascinated by this idea - does anyone have any idea how they managed to obtain clear images from a moving, vibtrating aircraft? I think that would be a useful addition to the article. 217.155.152.138 (talk) 09:03, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The optical instruments are on shock-mounted, gyro-stabilized platforms. —Quicksilver^{T @} 01:19, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Kuiper Airborne Observatory. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:15, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Apple pips and oranges

The article currently contains the excerpt "The KAO flew mostly out of Moffett Field, but also flew out of New Zealand, Australia, American Samoa, Panama, Japan, Guam, Brazil, Ecuador, Chile, Houston (Texas), and Hawaii." This lists entire countries alongside territories and specific states of America. This is inconsistent. If country-level precision is good enough, we should use it consistently. If state-level precision is needed for any one item in the list (in this case Texas, America) then the same precision applies to all the other items in the list (which provinces and territories in NZ? Which states and territories in Australia? Which districts in Panama? Which prefectures in Japan? Which states in Brazil? Which provinces in Ecuador? Which regions in Chile?)

It's like an article claiming "Carbon can be found in watermelons, grapefruit, oranges and the seeds from apples, the skin of apples, the stalk of apples and the flesh of apples" instead of simply saying "Carbon can be found in watermelons, grapefruit, oranges and apples". 49.195.120.227 (talk) 04:11, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]