Jump to content

Talk:Ladies' night

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Literally ladies?

[edit]

I've changed the definition slightly so that it reflects it may literally mean a lady (feminine female) and not just any female. I'm just guessing that if this was done in the US, someone is going to get sued right? still, I do like that practice haha Fatfool 12:57, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean? If a girl dresses a bit manly with short hair (e.g. like some lesbians do), they get no discount? I would doubt it, but I can't say - there is no ladies' night where I live afaik.W3ird N3rd (talk) 02:00, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

shouldn't there be an "in popular culture" section that cites the disco song? oh yes it's ladies night, and I'm feelin right... 74.73.164.164 (talk) 20:36, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Imbalance

[edit]

Once sentence about Ladies' night, and a ton of stuff about its legal status in various states of the US. 203.173.248.60 (talk) 01:05, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

US only?

[edit]

What I'm not getting from this article is this: does this phenomenon only exist in the USA, or also in other places around the world?W3ird N3rd (talk) 02:00, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Gender-Based Price Discrimination

[edit]

Hello,

I just wanted to add that I am currently working on a page with a related topic to this one.


As of now there is only one Wikipedia page, titled “Price Discrimination,” that dedicates space to talking about, more specifically, gender-based pricing discrimination. This page generally is poorly structured, includes original research, and only has one very small section discussing gender-based pricing discrimination - which itself is poorly organized and confusing. The parent page has been rated Start-Class. I have been advised to create my own subpage, which I hope to title “Gender-Based Price Discrimination,” in lieu of revamping the entire parent page. I also intend to sum up my article and change the parent page’s discussion on examples of gender-based price discrimination. As of now, the subsection discusses three cities/states that have litigated the issue or researched the issue. I will most likely add that information (if substantiated by relevant and appropriate sources) to my subpage and remove it from the parent page. I think it tends to bog down the reader with facts instead of explaining the overall concept of gender-based price discrimination. I also believe it can easily be summed up on the parent page and discussed at length on the subpage.


I have already created the new page: Gender-Based Price Discrimination


Here is my outline:


[Overview]

1 Gender Disparities in Pricing

1.1 Gender Disparities in Pricing of Personal Care Products

1.2 Gender Disparities in Retail Clothing

1.2.1 Children’s Clothing

1.2.2 Adult Clothing

1.3 Gender Disparities in Health Care Products

1.3.1 Senior Health Care

1.4 Gender Disparities in Car Prices

1.5 Gender Disparities in Services

1.5.1 Hair Salons

1.6 Gender Disparities in Insurance

1.6.1 Health Insurance

1.6.2 Car Insurance

2 Gender Disparities in Discounts

2.1 Ladies’ Night Discounts

2.1.2 New Jersey

3 Gender Disparities in Taxes

3.1 Tampon Tax

4 Consumer Protection Laws

4.1 United States

4.1.1 Federal Reforms

4.1.2 California

4.1.3 New York City

4.1.4 Miami Dade, Florida

FPizzo (talk) 18:12, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ladies' night. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:35, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]