This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pokémon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Pokémon universe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PokémonWikipedia:WikiProject PokémonTemplate:WikiProject PokémonPokémon articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture articles
Sources aren't looking great here: Nintendo Blast and Game Rant have no hallmarks of reliability, and anything primarily sourced to top ten listicles doesn't bode well for an encyclopedia... czar 03:03, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I removed the Game Rant source, because, though I have a very good track record with it, its staff is basically new to the video game industry. I'll do some research on Nintendo Blast when I get time for it, but I have a similarly good track record with it. It's a bit difficult to research the reliability of sources when you need Google Translate to understand them ^_^; I definitely believe the article stands well on its own, however. The three sources discussing Lavender Town Syndrome are great pieces, the Bloody Disgusting top 10 gives some great insight in the music of the town, and if Nintendo Blast is considered reliable, we generally have a lot of good stuff that wouldn't fit anywhere else without running into undeu weight issues. I'll be sure to look for more sources, though. ~Mable (chat) 04:38, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Eh, Bloody Disgusting isn't reliable either (old thread)—the article is marked "editorial" and written by someone who has published no other articles, and there is no about page to describe anything about the site's editorial process. I'd look into expanding this topic summary style within Pokémon#Fan_community, as this article is more about the fan community's relation to Lavender Town than the actual fictional town. If you'd like to make an article out of it, that whole Fan community section surely has the source material to be beefed up and expanded into its own overview article (Pokémon fandom). Some sources hereczar 14:13, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The last time it was mentioned wasn’t let’s go evee[edit]
In 2017 and 2019 Pokemon Go played it for the hollowed events but it was a little remix. So i don’t know it would be or wouldn’t count as the last time. 2600:1006:B055:5025:5C11:2609:21C2:8B36 (talk) 12:43, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
czar 03:03, 20 April 2017 (UTC)