Talk:List of power stations in Sweden

Future wind power

Currently, there are around two dozen proposed wind parks. It would be better to keep these off this list since, by definition, they don't exist. Maybe another article or list could be put up for them. --Adamrush (talk) 14:33, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

I've worked on a lot of "List of wind farms" articles and have never seen this issue of proposed wind farms becoming a problem before. Normally proposed wind farms are just added into the list (see, for example, List of wind farms in New South Wales), or if there are a lot of proposed farms then a separate table is included near the end of the article (see, for example, List of wind farms).
I would also remind you of WP:OWN. I've seen it happen before (Råshön wind farm), and it seems to be happening here again, where you are being obstructive and don't seem to want others to make changes to an article you have started. Please try to work more collaboratively. Johnfos (talk) 21:46, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

Putting up every press release that pops up in the media turns articles into garbage like this. Two lists would be a better way of framing this. --Adamrush (talk) 17:42, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

Renaming

Hello. Due to the fact that only a handfull of entries are listed here, i have moved the page to the current title, the parent subject. This would help in further expansions, and ease of access from the readers view. Of course, you are always welcome to speak up if this is a wrong move. But do keep in mind that a ton of other articles have also gone through this, without any problems. Regards. Rehman⁽⁺⁾ 14:46, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on List of power stations in Sweden. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090501155915/http://hem.passagen.se/kts/english/turbin/francis/francis.htm to http://hem.passagen.se/kts/english/turbin/francis/francis.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070626132859/http://www.stenarenewable.se/projekt/StenaRenewableEnergyAB-Fjallberget.asp to http://www.stenarenewable.se/projekt/StenaRenewableEnergyAB-Fjallberget.asp
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160302034341/http://www.arise.se/en/successful-project-start-finish to http://www.arise.se/en/successful-project-start-finish
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090207193822/http://www.vindenergi.org/driftuppfolj.htm to http://www.vindenergi.org/driftuppfolj.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:47, 1 January 2018 (UTC)