Jump to content

Talk:List of tributaries of the Danube

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

List of tributaries to Danube which are not listed in the article (for whatever reason):

River Reason
Karašica too short, 81 km
Mostonga too short, 70 km
Porečka reka too short, 50 km
Wien River too short
Traisen River not sure where it goes
Cerna River could be the river that enters the Danube at Iron gate
Kamp not sure where it goes
Abens not sure where it goes
Wörnitz not sure where it goes

From List of rivers of Austria:

From List of rivers of Germany:

Length criteria?

[edit]

Should there really be any requirements for a river to be so and so kilometre long to be included? There isn't really a way to determine what is "too short" and what is "long enough" (although the criteria here seem to be about 100 km), so I would support the inclusion of all tributaries of the Danube as this is what the article is about; i.e., it isn't named "List of larger tributaries of the Danube". What do you think? Todor Bozhinov  13:33, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, form practical point of view, it would be really hard to make a list of all tributaries of Danube. And for now we have 2 blue-linked rivers which are shorter than 100 km. Yes, we could make an incomplete list of all tributaries... but we could also make a complete list of tributaries of 100 km, and that would be one really nice featured list. But then again, I'm not very firm in my oppinion, if you wish you can put the shorter rivers to the list. And if we one day find all tributaries longer than 100 km, we can put them in a separate list (saaaay: List of main tributaries of the Danube), and make that list featured... don't know realy... --Dijxtra 14:25, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Of course, such a list would hardly ever be complete, but an effort to make it as complete as possible would be what the article title suggests. I'd wait a couple of days in case there's someone who has a totally different opinion and then proceed with the inclusion of those short rivers. Todor Bozhinov  18:37, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't we include Brigach and Breg in the list as well, rather than just mention them at the top? ~ trialsanderrors 16:42, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of tributaries of the Danube. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:09, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Nedeia River" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Nedeia River. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 15:24, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]