Talk:Lyman James Briggs

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Soil Low‑importance

	Earth sciences portal Lyman James Briggs is within the scope of WikiProject Soil, which collaborates on Soil and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.SoilWikipedia:WikiProject SoilTemplate:WikiProject SoilSoil articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Michigan Low‑importance

	Michigan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Michigan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Michigan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MichiganWikipedia:WikiProject MichiganTemplate:WikiProject MichiganMichigan articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

His role in the American atomic bomb

I haven't seen any explaination about why Lyman Briggs was dragging his feet on the Uranium Committee, but I would think that perhaps this is what Franklin D. Roosevelt would have wanted him to do. Until Pearl Harbor the US was at least technically neutral in the war in Europe. There were two competing uranium weapons programs, one in England and the other in Germany. Otto Frisch, Rudolf Peierls, Albert Einstein, Leo Szilárd, Eugene Wigner and Enrico Fermi were all refugees from Nazi Germany who would have wanted to align the US war effort with England. British scientists like Ralph Fowler and Mark Oliphant also wanted this alignment because it was good for Britian. Boris Pregel, a uranium dealer, could only have more business if the US effort ramped up. The international scientists all talked with eachother, so a large secret program was not an option. Winston Churchill wanted to rule the world and Harry Truman at times seemed more aligned to Churchill than he was to Roosevelt.

If I were Roosevelt I might have wanted to keep my options open and not start a large scale uranium project with England until it were clearly necessary. When Lyman Briggs locked the MAUD report in his safe, he may have been doing exactly what Roosevelt wanted him to do.

--Prmacn 21:27, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

In 1940 & 1941 all Churchill wanted to do was for Britain to survive the war, and for him to survive in government. Britain was fighting alone. (The Soviet Union did not enter the war until June 1941 and the USA not until December 1941.) Ruling the world was an unlikely ambition at that stage. All in all the paragraphs by Prmacn are not a cogent explanation why Roosevelt would want to deny himself the most powerful weapon imaginable. JMcC 08:23, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps, but doesn't it seem inappropriate to enter a value judgment such as "his undistinguished role" in the leading paragraph? The leading paragraph should be factual and uncontroversial. --Prmacn (talk) 01:13, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lyman James Briggs. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050408091010/http://www.lymanbriggs.msu.edu/about_lbs/Lyman-J-Briggs.html to http://www.lymanbriggs.msu.edu/about_lbs/Lyman-J-Briggs.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:29, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Lyman James Briggs. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:59, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]