Jump to content

Talk:Mackenzie Foy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Birth date?

[edit]

The article content indicates Nov 10 2000, while the infobox states Nov 10 2003. Which is it? 24.141.130.204 (talk) 17:40, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That was due to vandalism. November 10, 2000 is correct. -- Chamith (talk) 18:09, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
A bit late but I have added reference to her DOB, which she said in the interview. Mackenzie_Foy#cite_note-DOB-1 --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 17:07, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Mackenzie Foy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:24, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Images

[edit]

There is no point for such a short article to have so many similar images. To quote Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Images,

Images must be significant and relevant in the topic's context, not primarily decorative. ... too many can be distracting. ... Resist the temptation to overwhelm an article with images of marginal value simply because many images are available.

When we already have a portrait-style image in the lead, I don't see what two further such images in the main article body are supposed to convey. The question I posed in my edit summary still stands, what is the purpose of these images? 86.28.158.33 (talk) 10:15, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The 2012 image should stay – it depicts the subject when she was a child actress. Keeping the 2018 image is arguable – somebody probably wanted a more "current" image than the 2016 portrait image, but it isn't strictly necessary, and isn't of very high quality IMO. So if I would not object to removal of the 2018 image. But the 2012 image should stay. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 12:55, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I've removed the 2018 image for now. I think having too many images too close together is distracting for such a short article. If someone wants to make the case for re-inclusion, they're welcome to. 86.28.158.33 (talk) 13:17, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Razzies

[edit]

It seems that the Golden Razzie awards lack a reliable secondary source and only have a WP:PRIMARY source. That seems as good a reason as any to exclude them from the list. Elizium23 (talk) 06:15, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No, it's really not – that's not the metric we use for including awards. It's also patently untrue – this received significant secondary coverage: e.g. this, and this just for starters... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 14:12, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
IJBall, coverage in secondary sources is indeed one of the metrics we use for inclusion. And I think that this is a golden opportunity for you to improve the sourcing, since you are aware of such. Thanks. Elizium23 (talk) 14:23, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The metric for inclusion of awards is whether they have a Wikipedia page. Including a secondary source is preferred, but as long as the award has a page and WP:V is met, that's the standard. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 14:27, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Razzies are not a legit awards ceremony, it's a parody one and those shouldn't be listed on her page. --Sapphire — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sapphireblue101 (talk • contribs) 22:34, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is WP:NOTPROMOTION. See also WP:NOTCENSORED. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 22:46, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
See also List of awards and nominations received by Jennifer Lawrence, which is a WP:FL, and which includes a Razzie in the listing. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 22:50, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Mackenzie_Foy&oldid=1257776045"