Jump to content

Talk:Malati Rishidev

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Deletion objection. The reason provided for deletion is not strong enough. The nominator's reason is "She doesn't even break Khagendra Thapa Magar's record. And there's Prakash Sardar with a better claim". . Khagendra Thapa Magar, a male, is already dead, he is no more the record holder. Malati is a women record holder and still alive. nirmal (talk) 10:09, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

About this page

[edit]

See User talk:Nirmaljoshi#Do not use content farms or more than 4 references in the same place.

When the discussion is over, it will be archived here. Rastinition (talk) 04:55, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Rastinition: Its nice that you are super active. 4R is a good thumb rule and I have no problem with it. But, while you edit articles, i suggest you to read the article and references before making changes. The references at top may be used to make a point in other part of the same article. Some editor do not realize this and put "missing citation tags". In the case of this article, you surely realized the mistake, then added the referenes back at proper place. I suggest you to cool down, take a sip of beer and think twice before removing the referenes and editing the exitisting artciles. Also, I noted from your editiong history that you are diliberately removing chinese refernces resoning 4R everywhere. I am not sure what you are upto, but note that you may be blocked from editing in future if you diliberately remove selected references. I think you are well aware of WP:POV. Best regards! nirmal (talk) 09:17, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- also if you have plan to edit Nepal related projects, you may refer here for reliable references in Nepalese media. Best! nirmal (talk) 09:27, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
After seeing your reply, I found that you can understand what I said, and you know that I try to improve (if I have time). If you're in doubt about removing references, I'd say I know that unreliable sources increase unreliable results, so I don't want the wiki to be unreliable.While some content farms are true, not all of them are. And they will copy each other.If we check whether the content farm content is real every time, it will increase the trouble for editors and readers, it is not good for us. Rastinition (talk) 09:41, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Also I would like to add. References are also not recommended to use multiple sources of the same or similar content if they are from a reliable source.The reader will find that he wastes a lot of time reading the same content. That's how I felt a little earlier because I was reading at that time.--Rastinition (talk) 09:57, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wait! How long did I spend today on the wiki? It seems almost 11 hours, no wonder I feel sleepy... --Rastinition (talk) 10:26, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]