Talk:Manasser Biset

Manasser Biset has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: February 19, 2022. (Reviewed version).

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Middle Ages Low‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Source...

-- Ealdgyth (talk) 16:30, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, this doesn't actually have anything useful for Manasser ... interesting though. Ealdgyth (talk) 13:55, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Manasser Biset/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Gog the Mild (talk · contribs) 01:10, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'll have a look at this. Gog the Mild (talk) 01:10, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Link Anglo-Norman, justice.
- Linked. -- Ealdgyth (talk) 14:50, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Is Cany Cany-Barville?
- It appears so - linked. -- Ealdgyth (talk) 14:50, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Pugh: for consistency, could "canons" have an upper case C?
- Done. -- Ealdgyth (talk) 14:50, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Is it worth linking "follower" to retinue? And "steward" to Steward (office)?
- Linked steward - but he wasn't really in a "retinue" ... he just was a supporter of Henry II before he took the throne. -- Ealdgyth (talk) 14:52, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
"Biset's son was Henry Bisset" → 'They had a son, named Henry Bisset'.
- Well, no. We can't say "They had a son" because the source says "His [Manasser] son and heir was Henry Biset" - which pretty much says we don't have a charter that definitely gives Alice as Henry's mother. I did tweak the wording a bit. Ealdgyth (talk) 14:50, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
"Besides his son, Biset also had a daughter, Margaret." → 'Besides their son, Biset and Alice also had a daughter, Margaret.'
- Likewise - the source here doesn't say that Margaret was Alice's daughter, just that she was Henry's sister. -- Ealdgyth (talk) 14:50, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Pugh & Crittall: they are given as editors. Is that of the article or the volume? In either case is hte actual author of the work known?
- the page for British History Online for the work doesn't list authors ... just editors. Ealdgyth (talk) 14:50, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That's all I have. Gog the Mild (talk) 12:17, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

- Hope it wasn't too much of a strain! He's not got a lot but he's a link in various bits of history - and important in his own right as a pretty influential justice. It's just the period is sparse for documentation. -- Ealdgyth (talk) 14:50, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ha! It was very soothing. I often feel I have problems, but you seem to be making bricks without either mud or straw.

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed