Talk:Marcel Dzama

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Visual arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Canada Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Album art (from Serviceinformation's talk page)

I am finding it impossible to log a complaint about the removal of my edits on Marcel Dzama's page. I am removing the commercial work he has done for him as he does not consider it a part of his artistic career. Why do they keep getting put back? There is no reason to advertise for record companies on his Wikipedia page and to include a few but not all is incorrect and unprofessional. Please respond to me here. Thank you and I trust that you will take this into valid consideration so I don't have to keep coming back here. I appreciate that you do not block my IP either. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Serviceinformation (talk • contribs)

I'm not sure what you mean by commercial work done "for him". In any case, if Dzama has done commercial work or lent out his images for commercial purposes, that is a part of his overall biography. Wikipedia isn't a public-relations vehicle for artists. In other words, we don't just choose and pick what to include based on what someone considers representational of their over-all work. I likewise fail to see how listing these commercial projects as being advertising for the record labels. As just a point of comparison, see Jeff Wall and Gerhard Richter, two artists whose images have been used by Sonic Youth (for the albums Daydream Nation and The Destroyed Room: B-sides and Rarities) and that type of information is usually listed. The ideal of Wikipedia is that there is a possibility to cross-reference between articles (i.e "wikilink"), so information about Jeff Wall would be listed in the Wall article, the Sonic Youth article and the article for the album in question, with links to all articles. If it's part of public record, then it is part of an artist's biography. If Dzama doesn't "consider it a part of his artistic career", that's beside the point, unless he's discussed it in print. Then we could mention that in that section. But otherwise, there seems to be consensus that the information be kept in. Usually when there's an edit conflict, it's taken to the talk page of that article and discussed until consensus is reached. You could bring this discussion to the Dzama talk page to see what others think, but you shouldn't just delete information. We try to maintain WP:BLP when dealing with biographies, but as this information isn't libelous, it shouldn't be removed if consensus has been reached. Thanks. freshacconcispeaktome 21:59, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Many artist's biographies include this kind of commercial work. I don't see the problem.--Ethicoaestheticist (talk) 22:37, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment

While adding the Visual Arts infobox and cleaning up, I've downgraded the importance for the Canada project from mid to low, as per the assesment guidelines. Hope no one takes offense :-) Enki H. (talk) 06:08, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox picture

It might be worth considering replacing the current picture as it feels inappropriate with a better one, if anybody has one. GuzonjinSin (talk) 22:28, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Marcel Dzama. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:17, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]