Talk:Marwanids (Diyar Bakr)

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to the topics of Kurds and Kurdistan, broadly construed, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

I believe there is an intention to confuse. The Iranica reference seems to be talking about something else. Besides it gives no reference to what it asserts, The Marwanids in Amed (Diyarbakir) could not have been Arabs. We also have sharafnama asserting that they were Kurds. Unless there is more evidence I propose to delete this OR statement. --هیوا (talk) 09:54, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

On 12 August 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved from Marwanids to Marwanids (Diyar Bakr). The result of the discussion was moved.

Referenced information removed under false edit summary

Would User:Gomada care to explain why he removed a reference and referenced information from this article, using the false edit summary of "fixing sources.. continue..."?[1]

Buyids, Tilman Nagel, Encyclopaedia Iranica, (December 15, 1990);"The area of the upper Euphrates, Dīārbakr, was held by the Arab Marwanids, who, as the vassals of the Buyids, were involved in permanent warfare with Byzantium."[2] --Kansas Bear (talk) 16:49, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Iranica refers to them as a Kurdish dynasty in another article (AKHLAT), so it is in conflict with itself. However, most other academic sources consider them as Kurdish. Vekoler (talk)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Marwanids. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:36, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I think there is an error. Ibn al-Athir was born 1161, so he cannot be a contemporary to Nasr al-Dawla. Kurdo Chali

Protect this page

Can someone please make this article not to be edited, to protect it from vandalism. 212.237.120.162 (talk) 20:23, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"..to protect it from vandalism."

You mean like removing Arabic from the infobox? --Kansas Bear (talk) 21:11, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well there is no reference for that, so don't add something that has no sources to prove it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.237.121.34 (talk) 08:54, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Muslim dynasty uses what language for their religion? WP:SKYISBLUE. --Kansas Bear (talk) 13:05, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 12 August 2022

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) – robertsky (talk) 17:35, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Marwanids → Marwanids (Diyar Bakr) – The primary topic for the name Marwanids is the Umayyad Caliphate, entirely unrelated and materially more notable. This is clear from both Google Scholar and Google Books. An alternate name might be "Kurdish Marwanids". Onceinawhile (talk) 23:25, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support, but make Marwanids a dab page. Srnec (talk) 16:33, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support but agree that Marwanids should be a dab page. —Al Ameer (talk) 18:28, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

@Srnec and Al Ameer son: I have made the dab page. Would like either of you to update the description for the Caliphate accordingly. Thanks. – robertsky (talk) 17:39, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]