Talk:Mask of la Roche-Cotard
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
Wikipedians in France may be able to help! The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Reference added, "hoax" tag removed
[edit]I have removed "hoax" and "unreferenced" tags and added a reference to a BBC news report. That cites an article in "Antiquity" which is clearly the primary source, but is not available on-line without a password. JohnCD (talk) 13:41, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
Dating of the find
[edit]The authors first referred to this work in French in 1999 and 2000, so it wasn't found in 2002. I've read that the piece was actually discovered in 1975, but only interpreted later.[1]. Fences and windows (talk) 21:14, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
This isn't an (on-wiki) {{hoax}}, but I have grave doubts that this qualifies as much more than a Rorschach type illustration of our built-in face-recognition software, just like the rest of the stuff at Art of the Middle Paleolithic, probably more projection on our part than actual figurative representation on the Neanderthals'. --dab (𒁳) 07:46, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
- Haven't seen it, does someone have a useable photograph of the object for the page? Thanks. Randy Kryn 13:08 7 June 2014 (UTC)
There's a 2016 paper by Marquet et al. which dates the layer the mask was found in to 75ka - I'll add this onto the page with a source. Blueskies2021 (talk) 09:15, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
External links modified (January 2018)
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Mask of la Roche-Cotard. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111002180404/http://www.waspress.co.uk/journals/beforefarming/journal_20034/news/BF3-4_11_NewsPettitt.pdf to http://www.waspress.co.uk/journals/beforefarming/journal_20034/news/BF3-4_11_NewsPettitt.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:02, 20 January 2018 (UTC)