Talk:Mekia Cox

Mekia Cox was a Media and drama good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
January 12, 2011	Good article nominee	Not listed
March 4, 2011	Good article reassessment	Not listed
March 23, 2024	Good article nominee	Not listed
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on October 10, 2010. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Mekia Cox* can be seen dancing with Michael Jackson to the song "The Way You Make Me Feel" in* This Is It?
Current status: Former good article nominee

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers / Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians.

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Mekia Cox. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:41, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

Unsuccessful. sawyer * he/they * talk 00:40, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Mekia Cox/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: TonyTheTiger (talk · contribs)

Reviewer: Sawyer-mcdonell (talk · contribs) 23:49, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately I'm going to quickfail this. The sourcing is the single biggest issue, especially the fact that the article cites a forum post from 2010 three times, as well as IMDb and Broadwayworld.com, which are very much unreliable - this alone is enough for a quickfail, in my opinion. I'm also not convinced of the reliability of any of these sites [1] [2] [3] [4], to say the least. All of the mentioned sources should be removed and replaced with actual reliable sources. Not to mention the multiple dead links, poor writing, and superfluous information. This should've been fixed before the nomination. sawyer * he/they * talk 00:40, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.