|This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Mercury (element) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
|Mercury (element) has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.|
|Mercury (element) is part of the Group 12 elements series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.|
|Current status: Good article|
|Mercury (element) has been listed as a level-4 vital article in Science. If you can improve it, please do. This article has been rated as GA-Class.|
|This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:|
|This article has been mentioned by a media organization:|
Density of Mercury
If you could please include the density of mercury in kg/m^3. It would be much appreciated. It's 13594 kg/m^3. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mharuza (talk • contribs) 16:25, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
- The infobox already gives it in g·cm−3, and I don't think it's that hard to convert (it's just a decimal point shift, after all) that we ought to give it kg·m−3 as well. Double sharp (talk) 06:24, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
Edit request, 29 November 2013
|This edit request has been answered. Set the
In fourth line of Physical properties section, please correct 'electronic configuration' to 'electron configuration' (i.e. configuration of electrons) - the use of the adjective 'electronic' here is a hypercorrection, and is simply poor grammar masquerading as good, we need the two nouns juxtaposed. Thanks! Connymenzel (talk) 15:46, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
I believe it is of essence that something about the pressure unit mmHg and its similarities is talked about in here. or at least linked to, for reference.
Semi-protected edit request on 3 February 2015
|This edit request has been answered. Set the
Please add an external link
I believe this sentence is malformed:
"Another mercury compound, merbromin (Mercurochrome), is a topical antiseptic used for minor cuts and scrapes is still in use in some countries."
It either needs punctuation or text changed to make it structurally sound. Something like:
"Another mercury compound, merbromin (Mercurochrome), a topical antiseptic used for minor cuts and scrapes, is still in use in some countries."
"Another mercury compound, merbromin (Mercurochrome), is a topical antiseptic used for minor cuts and scrapes (that|and) is still in use in some countries."22.214.171.124 (talk) 14:46, 12 August 2015 (UTC) absmiths
Releases in the environment
the following statement is not supported by the reference to which are liked. if any thing the reference "Pacyna E G; Pacyna J M; Steenhuisen F; Wilson S (2006). "Global anthropogenic mercury emission inventory for 2000". Atmos Environ 40 (22): 4048." clearly statements the Opposite "The largest emissions of Hg to the global atmosphere occur from combustion of fossil fuels" and last i looked volcanoes don't burn fossil fuels per say.
"Natural sources, such as volcanoes, are responsible for approximately half of atmospheric mercury emissions".
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Mercury (element). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.indiana.edu/~poynter/sas/lb/syphilis.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at
Archived sources still need to be checked
Edit request, 1st of May 2016, Idrija (now Slovenia)
At the end od History chapter, as three main historic mercury mines are mentioned, the Idrija one is equipped with brackets (now Slovenia). I think the word "now" should be omitted, as Slovenia is a normal and permanent country, as Spain and Italy are. The Italian mine was not in Italy, say e.g. in mediaeval period, formally speaking, but in another country. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 126.96.36.199 (talk) 10:29, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Toxicity of Mercury
This article is rubbish. I challenge the writers who claim elemental mercury's "high toxicity" to support this. In the referenced Wiki article, Mercury poisoning, it is stated that the toxic effect of elemental (metallic) mercury is due to droplets of metal blocking the circulatory system (after being INJECTED!). Give me a break! Apparently the authors have zero understanding of the difference between Hg°, Hg(+1) and Hg(+2), and need to be kept away from keyboards and sharp instruments. I don't question the well established SLIGHT toxicity of mercury vapor inhalation (both chronic and acute) but I DO question the concentrations at which these effects have been demonstrated. Everything, including water, is toxic at a sufficiently high enough dose. I also question the claim that mercury is adsorbed through the skin in sufficient quantities to cause toxicity (at least, for those not swimming in it on a daily basis). My contention is that mercury (metallic or elemental) is only SLIGHTLY toxic, and while I agree that it should only be used with proper protective equipment and with adequate ventilation, it is no different (in this respect) from most metals - their vapors shouldn't be inhaled, and contact with them should be limited. This article FAILS to point out that bacteria (including some in the human gut) can transform the metal to methy and ethyl mercury, which ARE highly toxic. The metal was used for decades as a weight when pumping people's stomachs, and those reservoirs occasionally broke leading to NO toxic effects for the patient. For ingested mercury to be toxic, I expect exposure would have to exist for very long time periods. I await authoritative references...188.8.131.52 (talk) 22:28, 12 September 2016 (UTC)