Jump to content

Talk:Mick Ranger

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Sandline International

[edit]

Was ranger part of Sandline International? This quote seems to imply so:

According to Peter Goslar, once a close friend of Riaan Stander, other board members of Bridge SA were Colonel Tim Spicer and Mick Ranger "of Sandline fame".

British Army Lt Col Tim Spicer was but I don't know about Ranger... -- Esemono 14:34, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello There,

I know this probably isn't the best place to post this and I have no intentions to disrespect Mr Ranger.
I have a UK registered company and deal in exporting cars.I am interested in starting up an Arms Brokering business and trying to gather some information and advice. Would anyone know where to start from.Do UK and Cyprus based companies have to apply for FFL? There seem to be a limited information on the net.
Hope someone will help.

Regards. Erkan — Preceding unsigned comment added by Erkan85 (talkcontribs) 18:02, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]




Unclear sentence

[edit]

"Ranger knew of the restrictions and told the reporter not use the word, "Iraq" in any paperwork."

I'm not sure how this sentence is meant to read. I wonder if there's supposed to be "he would" between "reporter" and "not." I'll remove the comma, but leave the clarification to someone else. tildetildetildetilde —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.36.119.188 (talk) 02:20:05, August 18, 2007 (UTC)

Very shoddy page

[edit]

There was an unbelievable amount of POV and plain unsupported claims on this page, which I have done my best to tone down. In particular, the claim that "questionable dealings often end up violating United Nations embargoes" is not supported by the cited sources. The Syria deal was also misrepresented; a more objective reading of the cited source suggests Ranger wanted clear assurances that the weapons would not end up in Iraq. Nick Cooper 07:59, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008

[edit]

Removed Military History Tag as article is out of scope. --dashiellx (talk) 14:45, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mick Ranger. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:29, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Mick Ranger. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:13, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]