Jump to content

Talk:Mike Mularkey

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Complaint

[edit]

Mike Mularkey once called my high school to complain about a remark on our morning announcements he disagreed with. Would this be considered "original research" and not OK to put in the article? I'm going to see if I can find a mention about it in a local newspaper or the school bulletin. -Tom I'm a Douche Morrisey

Yes, this is original research because it can't be verified. RyguyMN 05:53, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Selective editing

[edit]

It looks like someone is consistently editing out the negative aspects of Mularkey's coaching career while adding in only positives. Also, the comments about his son's drug arrest was removed. Could it be Mularkey himself? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.67.131.156 (talk) 19:41, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hi. I'm a regular Wikipedia editor who works on a lot of the Florida Gators-related articles. I've just reviewed the last 15 months of edits (very easy to do when you use the compare function on the edit "history" page), and I see very few "negatives" remove from the article -- with the exception of the material about his son. His son is a non-notable person, and arguably, should be deleted from the article completely. The only other deletion that caught my eye was the removal of sentence about him being fired from the Dolphins when they were 1-15. But so what? Assistant coaches get fired all the time when the head coach does -- it's not really even noteworthy. Of fare greater concern to me is the fact that virtually all of the material added in the last year is not verified and sourced to footnoted media articles per WP:V, WP:RS and WP:BLP. The clean-up will take some work . . . . Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 20:46, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mike Mularkey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:56, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]