Talk:Mortal Kombat: Rebirth
entry edits
[edit]lorem ipsum I personally know a stuntman/fight choreographer in Hollywood who's friends with most of the guys who're featured in the MK:Rebirth and am in contact with a couple of them. Object404 (talk) 07:03, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
- Pretty much the definition of Original Research. Unless we have an external source to confirm something it can't be used on Wikipedia. Planewalker Dave (talk) 07:38, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
- James Lew is Shang Tsung. Please stop reverting this.Object404 (talk) 10:08, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
- Hey. I've asked Richard Dorton and he's confirmed that James Lew is indeed Shang Tsung. It's not "original research", it's a first-hand source. How much more accurate can you get? Give credit to James Lew, man. The guy is a legend and has done a lot for the world of entertainment!Object404 (talk) 17:42, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
- Actually by Wikipedia's standards that is exactly original research, see WP:ORIGINAL. I did try and find and connection to Jame Lew on the internet with no avail, even the site you linked as his personal website is 2 years out of date. To help alleviate problems in the near future I am going to place a citation needed tag on it, this no guarantee no one else will remove it. Mcmatter (talk) 00:45, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
- It's an Easter Egg thing and you can't find it anywhere else in the internet except with blog comments who were able to guess correctly. I asked through facebook. Richard's an awesomely nice guy and I was tickled pink to re-confirm. :) I'm not going to post private conversations, so you won't be able to cite this with links. Wikipedia rules says first-hand information is okay, as long as it's used properly. I mean c'mon, dude. You're trying to create an academic research article on Mortal Kombat? Can't you see how hilariously facepalm this conversation is? :) Cheers! -object404 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.50.221.68 (talk) 08:44, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
- Look I'm not saying the information is wrong, I wouldn't know, what I am saying is it doesn't meet the Wikipedia criteria. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a gossip site, which means all the information on here needs to be verifiable in a published source (magazine, book or reputable website). "The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth—whether readers can check that material added to Wikipedia has already been published by a reliable source, not whether editors think it is true." taken from Wikipedia:Verifiability. Mcmatter (talk) 13:52, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
- Matt Mullins has confirmed as well. I am a reliable secondary source as defined by Wikipedia:No original research. I have now tweeted it. It is now defined as "published in an external source". It is now properly cited in keeping with Wikipedia's core backbone of Our policy: Wikipedia articles usually rely on material from secondary sources. All stringent Wikipedia criteria now met. Do you see how inane this system and your obstinance is? I offer neither offense nor insult, but you, good sir, are the very definition of a know-it-all internet nerd jackass. Feel free to write a scholarly academic research paper on Mortal Kombat which can be submitted to reputable scientific journals. Respectfully yours, Object404 (talk) 06:58, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
- update: Found James Lew's tweet on Twitter confirming it, updated Shang Tsung citation link in article. Cheers! Object404 (talk) 08:31, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
- Matt Mullins has confirmed as well. I am a reliable secondary source as defined by Wikipedia:No original research. I have now tweeted it. It is now defined as "published in an external source". It is now properly cited in keeping with Wikipedia's core backbone of Our policy: Wikipedia articles usually rely on material from secondary sources. All stringent Wikipedia criteria now met. Do you see how inane this system and your obstinance is? I offer neither offense nor insult, but you, good sir, are the very definition of a know-it-all internet nerd jackass. Feel free to write a scholarly academic research paper on Mortal Kombat which can be submitted to reputable scientific journals. Respectfully yours, Object404 (talk) 06:58, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
- Look I'm not saying the information is wrong, I wouldn't know, what I am saying is it doesn't meet the Wikipedia criteria. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a gossip site, which means all the information on here needs to be verifiable in a published source (magazine, book or reputable website). "The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth—whether readers can check that material added to Wikipedia has already been published by a reliable source, not whether editors think it is true." taken from Wikipedia:Verifiability. Mcmatter (talk) 13:52, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
- It's an Easter Egg thing and you can't find it anywhere else in the internet except with blog comments who were able to guess correctly. I asked through facebook. Richard's an awesomely nice guy and I was tickled pink to re-confirm. :) I'm not going to post private conversations, so you won't be able to cite this with links. Wikipedia rules says first-hand information is okay, as long as it's used properly. I mean c'mon, dude. You're trying to create an academic research article on Mortal Kombat? Can't you see how hilariously facepalm this conversation is? :) Cheers! -object404 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.50.221.68 (talk) 08:44, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
- Actually by Wikipedia's standards that is exactly original research, see WP:ORIGINAL. I did try and find and connection to Jame Lew on the internet with no avail, even the site you linked as his personal website is 2 years out of date. To help alleviate problems in the near future I am going to place a citation needed tag on it, this no guarantee no one else will remove it. Mcmatter (talk) 00:45, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
- Hey. I've asked Richard Dorton and he's confirmed that James Lew is indeed Shang Tsung. It's not "original research", it's a first-hand source. How much more accurate can you get? Give credit to James Lew, man. The guy is a legend and has done a lot for the world of entertainment!Object404 (talk) 17:42, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
- James Lew is Shang Tsung. Please stop reverting this.Object404 (talk) 10:08, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
Status
[edit]So is this movie getting made or what? 152.179.30.66 (talk) 22:46, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
info about web series
[edit]- http://tv.ign.com/articles/114/1145684p1.html
- http://www.gamespot.com/news/6286845.html
- http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE70N5Q020110124
- http://www.gamespy.com/articles/114/1145701p1.html
- http://www.ifc.com/news/2011/01/fans-demand-new-mortal-kombat.php
- http://www.joystiq.com/2011/01/24/live-action-mortal-kombat-digital-series/
- http://www.gamefocus.ca/news/12558
- http://worthplaying.com/article/2011/1/24/news/79455/
- http://marquee.blogs.cnn.com/2011/01/25/mortal-kombat-digital-series-coming/
- http://www.homemediamagazine.com/vod/warner-creating-mortal-kombat-online-series-21784
A lot of info. just wanted to post it here before it's gone, and/or difficult to find. Alot of it is summarized between the raticles already posted but I wanted to add those for foresight. Those should work for development information. Sincerely Subzerosmokerain (talk) 00:22, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
Same thing but with the actors
[edit]http://www.gateworld.net/news/2011/02/stargate-alums-robbins-penikett-cast-in-new-mortal-kombat-web-series/ http://popwatch.ew.com/2011/02/14/mortal-kombat-rebirth-jeri-ryan/ http://tv.ign.com/articles/115/1150222p1.html http://multiplayerblog.mtv.com/2011/02/14/mortal-kombat-rebirth-web-series-cast-to-include-jeri-ryan-and-michael-jai-white/ http://www.rttnews.com/Content/EntertainmentNews.aspx?Section=2&Id=1554428&SM=1 http://www.heyuguys.co.uk/2011/02/16/jeri-ryan-confirmed-for-mortal-kombat-rebirth/ Sincerely Subzerosmokerain (talk) 00:06, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
Episode 1 Release April 13th
[edit]http://www.dreadcentral.com/news/43648/mortal-kombat-web-series-sets-debut-date —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.34.99.236 (talk) 05:15, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
This article is written in an absolutely broken English
[edit]--Niemti (talk) 16:12, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
Not anymore. --Niemti (talk) 16:15, 7 April 2012 (UTC)