Talk:Mount Coot-tha, Queensland

Australia: Brisbane / Queensland B‑class Low‑importance

	Australia portal Mount Coot-tha, Queensland is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
B	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Brisbane task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Queensland (assessed as Mid-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Queensland.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Mountains Low‑importance

	Mountains portal This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MountainsWikipedia:WikiProject MountainsTemplate:WikiProject MountainsMountain articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cycling: Mountain Biking Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cycling, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cycling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CyclingWikipedia:WikiProject CyclingTemplate:WikiProject Cyclingcycling articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Mountain Biking task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Highest Peak

The use of the term "highest peak in Brisbane" is a bit disingenuous. The western ramparts of Mount Glorious lie within the City of Brisbane's Local Government Area and rise over 700m above sea level, which is much higher than Mount Coot-tha. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.241.42.1 (talk) 12:54, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the claim does seem to hinge on what is defined as a "peak". Looking at Summit and from there Topographic prominence, it seems that the land at 700 metres within Brisbane's boundaries is not a peak but simply part of the slope rising to the peak of Mt Glorious (which is in Moreton Bay Region). There are some localised unnamed high points between Mt Glorious and Mt Coot-tha which are higher than Mt Coot-tha, but I am guessing from the Topographic prominence article that these are subpeaks of Mt Glorious. But I see no reason why the Mount Coot-tha article should not acknowledge that there is higher land within Brisbane. @Shiftchange:, what are your thoughts on this? Kerry (talk) 21:51, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

However, I note the article makes the claim about highest peak in Brisbane and links to Brisbane as a metropolis (a somewhat ill-defined boundary) rather than Brisbane as an LGA (a well-defined boundary). It's less clear the claim of Mt Coot-tha being the highest peak is defensible if we are talking about the Brisbane metropolis as that extends into other local government areas. At a minimum, the claim should be restricted to Brisbane LGA. Kerry (talk) 21:56, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's not even the highest peak in the Brisbane LGA. A review of the Queensland Government's online topographical maps (QTopo ^[1]) shows that Northbrook peak (659 MASL) straddles the borders of the Brisbane City and Somerset Region LGAs. Even if you were to restrict the claim to the highest peak wholly contained within the Brisbane LGA, that would appear to be Boombana Knob (432 MASL). 60.241.42.1 (talk) 05:24, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ http://qtopo.dnrm.qld.gov.au/

Untitled

Should this article be deleted and redirected to Mount Coot-tha because that article covers both the mountain and the suburb? - Shiftchange 02:44, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have merged the two separate articles for Mount Coot-tha into a single article with the title of Mount Coot-tha, Queensland. Figaro 10:10, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Suburban infobox

Is there any way of modifying the Mount Coot-tha suburban infobox, where the name of "Mount Coot-tha" can be split differently, by having a break before the word "Coot-tha", so that the suburban infobox would show the name of Mount Coot-tha as:

Mount

Coot-tha

instead of as:

Mount Coot-

tha

which is how the name of "Mount Coot-tha" is shown at present. Thanks. I have tried to correct this myself, but have found the problem impossible to fix up because the name of "Mount Coot-tha" is not listed within the suburban box. Figaro 21:10, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think you would need to post this question on the Template page for the info box, and ask them to fix the template maybe? otherwise I don't know of a way to solve this. Rimmeraj 02:03, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have now done this, so hopefully something might be able to be done to fix the problem up. Figaro 04:40, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Snow ??

Can we please have a reference for this. I have never heard of snow being recorded on Mount Coot-tha. --Biatch (talk) 02:41, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Mount Coot-tha, Queensland. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:04, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[1] ttp://qtopo.dnrm.qld.gov.au/

[1]