Jump to content

Talk:2 June Movement

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Movement 2 June)


Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 15 January 2019 and 21 May 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): J-bone52.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 13:03, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

[edit]

This article is too simplistic, and is in dire need of sources. From where comes the idea that many 2 juni members joined RAF in the eighties? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.112.137.50 (talk) 23:43, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

what kind of a translation is "movement 2 june" . movement 2 (TWO// spoken: TO) june??? shouldnt it be "2nd" (second), since refers to a date?--62.154.195.115 (talk) 09:58, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"Baader-Meinhof Gang"

[edit]

I think it is too simplistic to say that this is how the German press referred to the RAF. The use of "gang" vs. "group" was contingent upon the political stance of the publication.Enslin 20:22, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on 2 June Movement. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:30, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Teufel

[edit]

The section on Teufel says he spent five years awaiting trial from 1975, and was then sentenced to five years, but that he was free by 1982. Is this accurate? Konli17 (talk) 05:31, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't make sense to me. Konli17 (talk) 14:07, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well, if in doubt go back to the sources. Here the reference is the New York Times, which says "Mr. Teufel spent five years in prison awaiting trial, only to present a watertight alibi in court: when the kidnapping took place he was working under a false name in an Essen factory that made toilet seats. He said that he had kept silent to expose the arbitrary nature of West German justice. Nonetheless, he was convicted of robbery, firearms offenses and membership in a criminal organization and sentenced to five years in prison, moot at that point" (emphasis added). So according to NYT, he was sentenced to five years but had already served five years in pretrial detention, which seems pretty nuts but would explain why he was around in 1982. Checking this out has made me see strong copyviolations with the source, so i'll change it a bit now. Mujinga (talk) 14:40, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Anarchist?

[edit]

The article associates the group with anarchism but it's either unsourced or not clearly mentioned in the sourcing. The German Wikipedia article doesn't mention anarchism at all. What sources are making this connection? czar 07:04, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I checked the source used for anarchism and the website doesn't seem to be an RS. But there are good sources indicting anarchism here of the Stanford University, here of the Konrad Adenauer Foundationand here of the Spiegel.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 07:23, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]