|This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:|
- 1 difference between a symphonic orchestra and a philarmonic orchestra
- 2 possibilities to get a quarrelling band back to work again
- 3 Beastie Boys is not in 3 part there in 4 part
- 4 WHAT ABOUT JOURNEY & MEGADETH
- 5 Poison
- 6 Rock Band
- 7 Ugly Article
- 8 Rap and Vocal Groups
- 9 Example line-ups
- 10 I just moved
- 11 Lists of bands
- 12 Why is a pair of music students pictured in this article?
- 13 Combos
- 14 Name
difference between a symphonic orchestra and a philarmonic orchestra
To the best of my knowledge, there is no difference between a symphonic orchestra and a philarmonic orchestra in terms of the number of musicians, instruments, musical arrangement, and quality of the musical performance, but there is a significant difference between the two terms as symphonic orchestra refers to a group of professional musicians who get paid for their musical performance, whereas the term philarmonic orchestra refers to a group of philantropic musicians who do not get paid, at least in theory, for their musical performance. The term philharmonic is rooted on philantropy or philantropic, and means, from its Greek root, philos (friend), and harmony ... namely, friends of harmony. I got this info a few years ago from a well known American musicologist. You may review the concept, and make a correction to your article if needed. (Comment by 220.127.116.11 on 22 October 2004)
"[T]he term philarmonic orchestra refers to a group of philantropic musicians who do not get paid, at least in theory, for their musical performance."
The term "philharmonic", though bearing the same root (philos) as "philanthropic", is not directly related to the term otherwise. Better translated, it better be read "pleasing/friendly sounds" than "friends of harmony." I don't believe there is any correlation between whether an ensemble calls itself a philharmonic orchestra and whether the members are paid for performances. 18.104.22.168 (talk) 16:03, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
possibilities to get a quarrelling band back to work again
Beastie Boys is not in 3 part there in 4 part
WHAT ABOUT JOURNEY & MEGADETH
Journey is definetely worthy to be on the list with alot of hit songs and a national anthem "Don't Stop Believin."
Megadeth should to with a bunch of good songs. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 22.214.171.124 (talk) 20:02, 14 June 2010 (UTC) the examples are for clarification. this is a list of different types of musical ensembles, NOT a list of bands.
ExCuSe Me SiR, BuT PoIsOn iS A 4 PaRt BaNd WhIcH ThEy HaVe HiTs SuCh As "Talk dirty to me" "Don't need nothin but good time" and the famous power ballad "Every Rose Has Its Thorn" So please add this thank you —Preceding unsigned comment added by 126.96.36.199 (talk) 20:11, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
I suggest that a rock band article is madre. Rock bands cover enough grounds to have an individual page. Also, there is no introduction to rock bands. I came here to read about rock bands and could only find their classification by amount of members, which is not what i was looking for. This article does not explain what a rock band is. —Preceding unsigned comment added by ARBoughton (talk • contribs) 23:46, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
I think you are right. If one is interested in the line up of a particular band, they should search the bands page. I would suggest someone deletes all the bands, explains few exsamples of typical line ups instead of trying to cover every possible line up. The german version of this page is much more informative by the way. Die bibi (talk) 19:06, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
Wow - this article is all over the place. It seems like we'd be better served with a much shorter but much broader entry with brief summaries of all of the different kids of bands along with links to new entries that get into the detail that is awkwardly/unevenly distributed here. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.8.131.52 (talk) 17:58, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
Rap and Vocal Groups
I just wanted to say that I think there are way too many line up examples. I would like to see the number of them reduced and/or made into a table or chart or something. Thanks. 184.108.40.206 (talk) 04:57, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
I just moved
The Everly Brothers, here, cutting them out of the "Two person" (or something) section because they rarely recorded or performed as a two piece. Rather they were surrounded by amazing session musicians all the time. But I think that I mostly will NOT get involved with this article. It reeks of "vested interests" and "entrenched positions" and other stuff that I mostly avoid Carptrash (talk) 00:20, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
Lists of bands
I've just removed all the unlinked and red-linked bands listed in the article. I actually think that each paragraph should mention no more than two or three bands - if you want lists, use categories, or create list articles - but I don't feel confident in pruning them. But it's a no-brainer to remove any that haven't even got a WP article. --ColinFine (talk) 09:12, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
Why is a pair of music students pictured in this article?
Is there a good reason for http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:CCMDonation29.JPG to be in this article? It doesn't seem to depict any particular ensemble or any thing mentioned in the article. Willondon (talk) 14:38, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
I just searched the word "Combo" (ie Jazz combo) with no results to show for it. Should there not be some mention of Combos?
Wouldn't music band be a more popular name? Google books suggests it beats music ensemble (which, incidentally, is about twice as popular as the current musical ensemble) by 6:5. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 07:41, 3 August 2013 (UTC) We're going for correct and succinct here, not popular. A group of people who play music together is a Musical Ensemble, not a Music Ensemble (because the suffix -al is added to "music" to make its adjective form "musical", which modifies "ensemble.") — Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.127.116.11 (talk) 01:44, 17 November 2013 (UTC)