Talk:Nansha, Guangzhou

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved. Nathan Johnson (talk) 16:42, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nansha New Area → Nansha District – The move by User:Makecat on Nov 29, 2012 was totally unfounded and without proper research. Nansha was never renamed. Even today the official website and documents still use the word "district". "New Area" is merely a more or less decorative designation representing favorable policy support from the state. This is different from Binhai and Pudong, where they are directly named "New Areas". Kxx (talk | contribs) 07:53, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, that's my fault. Please move back. --Make cat 04:39, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Move follow up

Now that you have flipped-flopped this back & forth, please correct the opening sentence in the lead paragraph. Currently it reads: Nansha New Area, formerly known as Nansha District. I think it should be the other way around? Also, please tag the redirect Nansha New Area with either {{R from former name}} or {{R from alternative name}}, as applicable. Thanks, Senator2029 ➔ Talk 01:33, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]