It was more a splinter spinoff. The WWF version started with Farooq, then PG-13, who were in both, started up the the USWA branch.188.8.131.52 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 20:14, 14 December 2009 (UTC).
There's fancruft, original research and possibly some completely inaccuracies (see comment above) in the article. Some of the sources are total crap. I don't have time to do this myself right now but I'll look into it in the next couple of days, time permitting. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹Speak 05:57, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
Yeah, I just started reading this article, and what you're saying is still true 3 years later. Feedback☎ 11:54, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: moved.Number57 17:53, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
The Nation of Domination → Nation of Domination – This is something of a test case. I thought it would be straightforward and uncontroversial, until I noticed that many members of Category:WWE teams and stables have titles including "The". I haven't reviewed other articles, but certainly this topic doesn't seem to meet any of the criteria at WP:THE. Also, "The" is omitted in the infobox, and the group is referred to by the abbreviation NOD, not TNOD. Am I overlooking something? --Relisted.George Ho (talk) 22:48, 16 May 2015 (UTC) --BDD (talk) 19:41, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
My only opinion would be that a ".. (WWF)" or similar suffix would assist navigation and recognition. GregKaye 10:33, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
It existed in both the WWF and USWA, so specifying one promotion wouldn't work. It would also be unnecessary to add a qualifier, as there is no other group with the same name (see WP:QUALIFIER). GaryColemanFan (talk) 05:22, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
Do not move. When they came to the Ring they were not "Nation" but "the Nation" and does NOT fail the WP:THE thingamabob they are a Sports (entertainment) team after all. MPJ -US
-and why do a separate article on a team that "never got off the ground"? That is straight from the article? They were a footnote at best. MPJ -US 17:30, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
Support. I agree with BDD, this should be straightforward application of WP:THE. Just read over the article and the definite article is never capitalised except at the beginning of a sentence. The same goes for the vast majority of sources. Jenks24 (talk) 14:57, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
Support per WP:THE. This seems pretty straightforward, and the others should be moved too.--Cúchullaint/c 14:53, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
Support per nom. It doesn't meet WP:THE, since it is written without the capitalized article in some of the reference texts. kennethaw88 • talk 03:08, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.