Jump to content

Talk:Naval Aircraft Factory PN

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Boeing PB

[edit]

Despite the current redirect, the original Boeing PB was not a variant of the PB - although the design was by the Naval Aircraft Factory, it was larger, and was powered by two engines in Tandem.Nigel Ish (talk) 13:59, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Agree it appears to be no relation, I had a note to look at this after it was created as it looked wrong, I though that Boeing PB should be linked to the Boeing Model 50 but it also refers to the Boeing B-17. Not a problem for this page. MilborneOne (talk) 11:25, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
From the Boeing Model 50 article, it looks like the XPB was supposed to be used in conjunction with some PN-9s for a long-distance flight, hence someone thought it best to redirect the page here. Generally that's a bad editorial decision, but it's understandable that someone would do that, since the Model 50 article was only created yesterday. - BilCat (talk) 11:40, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Btw, that redirect was created by User:Petebutt along with a slew of other redirects he created in April and May of this year. Not surprising! - BilCat (talk) 12:05, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Naval Aircraft Factory PN. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:46, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Naval Aircraft Factory PN. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:42, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]