Talk:No, Thank You

Korea Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Korean popular culture working group.

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Internet culture Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Internet culture To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : View all requested internet culture articles
Expand : Pick an article from here or here
Photo : Category:Internet culture articles needing images
Stubs : All stubs are located here
Other : Category:Internet self-classification codes (!?); Try to get YouTube to FA; Tag all articles you find with {{WikiProject Internet culture}}
- See also Category:Internet culture articles needing attention

Requested move 19 July 2023[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: no consensus. Participants were divided over whether the punctuation differences were sufficient to distinguish this article from other entries at No Thank You. Both arguments were predicated on WP:SMALLDETAILS and whether it was applicable here; divided interpretations of that policy prevented either side of the discussion from achieving consensus. (closed by non-admin page mover) ModernDayTrilobite (talk • contribs) 14:40, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No, Thank You → No, Thank You (TV series) – This is not the primary topic over other entires at No Thank You; a comma is nowhere near sufficient disambiguation here. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 17:17, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Weak support the TV series has 817 views but the novel has 337 and per WP:SMALLDETAILS we probably can't rely on the absence of the exclamation marks to distinguish. The album has more views (4,322)[[1]] but doesn't indicate its called with the comma but it would not be unreasonable to expect it here. This title was originally a redirect to the DAB created by the nom in 2016 until this article was created in 2021. Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:57, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per WP:DIFFPUNCT. This is the only page with this specific spelling, so should not carry parenthetical disambiguation. What is required instead is a hatnote to the disambiguation page, which I have added. Mdewman6 (talk) 19:37, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per WP:DIFFPUNCT, not consistent or distinctive. In ictu oculi (talk) 15:08, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. DIFFPUNCT gives Airplane! vs. Airplane as an example where italicization and an exclamation point are sufficient. The three exclamation point difference with No, Thank You!!! passes that bar in my opinion. I originally added the novel to the hatnote, but linking to the album makes more sense per popularity. ― Synpath 16:35, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
SMALLDETAILS probably doesn't work for No, Thank You!!! as the !s are a variant of "No, Thank You" not the other way round. Airplane and Airplane! work because the former is the primary topic (primary over the film) and the film is the only topic that a reader typing "Airplane!" could be looking for. Crouch, Swale (talk) 20:13, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. Honestly, do the DIFFPUNCT citers really think this is helping Wikipedia navigation? Do they really expect people to know which titles use a comma and which do not? -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:28, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

How does this move improve navigation? This move would send everyone typing/clicking on the correct title in the search bar to a disambiguation page (I assume the proposal implicitly is to redirect the current title to No Thank You as a {{R from ambiguous term}}). I believe it's more likely than not that someone typing the comma intends to reach the content with this title, or at least would not be astonished to be brought there. For those users who seek something different, they should be sent to the disambiguation page via a hatnote, which is what DIFFPUNCT says, and DIFFPUNCT is policy. Ambiguity does not necessarily mean there should be parenthetical disambiguation; it's a last resort when two topics share the same the base name and other disambiguation methods are inappropriate (WP:NCDAB). "No, Thank You" is the best title for this article per WP:CRITERIA, and no other topic shares this exact base name, so no disambiguation in the title is required (i.e., WP:SMALLDETAILS aka DIFFPUNCT is a logical extension of WP:QUALIFIER) and hatnotes are used to address ambiguity with similar base names. In other words, it's the hatnote doing the disambiguation, not the comma. Mdewman6 (talk) 18:09, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.