Talk:Nonpoint source pollution

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Environment (Rated C-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized.
Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Articles for deletion This article was nominated for deletion on 21 February 2006. The result of the discussion was keep.

Forestry sections[edit]

The info on forestry and logging's effects on pollution are oversimplified to the point of being inaccurate. They also lack any sources. Myself or someone else knowledgeable about timber harvesting, forest engineering and forest hydrology should correct and clarify when they have a chance. Cfwschmidt (talk) 19:05, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

Merge with non-point sources[edit]

These two articles are about the same subject. They should be merged. Neelix (talk) 20:37, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

Merge. Moreau1 (talk) 03:30, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
Done --Geronimo20 (talk) 05:38, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

Air Pollution[edit]

This term could reasonably be applied to air (and other types of) pollution as well. I've always understood it as air pollution rather than water pollution.

Also the definition is a bit unreasonable. There seem to be two reasonable definitions: 1) hard to control because it's coming from many places which in turn are under little control (cars for example), or 2) hard to figure out where it's coming from (runoff), but both these definitions aren't very good because they're extremely artificial... where does one draw the line between runoff from multiple farms and runoff from a single farm for example. —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 20:33, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

I agree with that non-point source polluation refers to all types of pollution: green, blue and brown. The big question is where to draw the line between localized and non-point source pollution. I would venture to say that it is a sliding scale and non-point source pollution is more of a catch phrase than an unambigious scientific term.

Gideon Kruseman Environmental economist —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gideon.kruseman (talkcontribs) 09:03, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

No references have been provided that document the use of "nonpoint source" terminology for air pollution. The NOAA reference currently in the article does not associate the term with air pollution. Area source is commonly used to describe this air pollution concept, at least in the US (e.g., Clean Air Act). Moreau1 (talk) 03:30, 30 July 2016 (UTC)