Talk:Nordic Council

Area + population ranks

I'm not sure what "ranked 19th" and "ranked 45th" on these are for... It doesn't seem to be correct either, after following the links. I personally don't think this union should have a rank among individual countries anyway. -- Jugalator 02:29, July 12, 2005 (UTC)

I hope it's okay that I removed those stated ranks. The ranks are just misleading, since other countries occupy those particular ranks. The lists are meant for single countries. But if there were to be lists of unions of countries ranked according to area and population, the Nordic Council could be ranked there then. Mad Greg 21:24, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

User:Jmw0000's edit

This edit by Jmw0000 effectively undid a prior edit made by me. Jmw0000, your edit summary simply stated rv. vandalism. This inappropriate use of both the edit summary and the term vandalism irritates me. I strongly advise you not to use "vandalism" as an epithet, but only refer to an edit as such if it is beyond reasonable doubt that the edit in question does in fact constitute vandalism. I have now restored my prior edit, and will be keeping a watchful eye on this talk page to see if you are going to explain your grievances here or post any constructive suggestions for how the article might be improved. BigAdamsky|TALK|EDITS| 13:49, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

The reason for it wasn't to attack you; my assumption was that user 151.188.16.40 vandalized the page, and I missed the continuance of the page at the bottom when I saw the edit. I was following this user around and reverting his edits. This was my error of not looking at either page closely. For that I apologize. I was simply not being a good editor. And chill, you're allowed to revert things without getting all uppity. If you want to bother me again, try making it something important, rather than something borderline childish. J. M. 15:21, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

Noted. Happy editing. BigAdamsky|TALK|EDITS| 16:06, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

NORDEK

Some sources (Laursen for example) suggest that it was Denmark that proposed the creation of the Nordic Economic Union (NORDEK) at the Nordic council session in 1968. If so, could we include this into the text? RedZebra 17:51, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

Nordic Council's Film Prize

Please, mention or create an article about the Nordic Council's Film Prize. If it exists under another name, please, let me know. Hoverfish Talk 15:34, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

Nordic Council Film Prize--JBellis (talk) 17:25, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

Overlap

This article has some overlap with Nordic Passport Union. --Apoc2400 11:45, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Scottish Islands?

What Scottish islands are the ones referred to, who have supposedly yet to take an interest in joining the Nordic Council? Surely such islands would not be able to join without the rest of Scotland and Britian. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.42.175.133 (talk) 15:19, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

I would assume that is primarily a reference to Shetland and Orkney, both former Norwegian possessions. -- Nidator ^{T / C} 04:06, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

I have deleted the reference to Germany, Netherlands and Scottish islands not showing an interest in joining. This is clearly a non-story 92.12.208.70 (talk) 12:12, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Confusion

Both this article and the official website is a tad fuzzy on details. From what I gather looking through the website though, the Nordic Council and the Nordic Council of Ministers are two separate bodies, the former being a parliamentary assembly (the fact it is composed of delegations of national MPs is unmentioned in this article) and the other being the intergovernmental forum referred to in the lead. We then also have a Nordic investment bank and a Nordic cultural fund that go unmentioned but what I can't find out is how all these institutions are linked, is there an umbrella organisation or are they largely independent, held together by solid Nordic reliability and common membership? Furthermore, there seems no mention of the autonomous territories as "associate" members, but rather they are shown as joining on certain dates but being included in the member totals of the main member states.

Can someone clarify all this? I'm utterly confused by this organisation. Is there a better source of data than the official site?- _J.Logan`^t: 11:14, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

{{Nordic Council}}

Template:Nordic Council (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) has been nominated for deletion -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 01:27, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Nordic Council. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20150218024134/http://www.norden.org/webb/news/news.asp?lang=6&id=6795 to http://www.norden.org/webb/news/news.asp?id=6795&lang=6

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 03:57, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

Should Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania be added to the map?

(Apologies if I'm doing this wrong, I'm new to editing).

Should the Baltic States be added to the map since they are Observers, maybe in a different colour? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Emil2205 (talk • contribs) 17:15, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

No, they are not members of the Nordic Council and not Nordic countries. --Bjerrebæk (talk) 00:07, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

Where exactly in academic research does it say that being a member of The Nordic Council is a prerequisite of being defined as a "Nordic country"? Scandinavia, Norden, Nordic - those are three different words with three different meanings. See Nordic race for where the "nordic" term got started. The Scandinavian countries then later decided to unilaterally use that word for the Nordic Council in 1952. SørenKierkegaard (talk) 13:05, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

In any case, I don't see why observer countries shouldn't be added to the map, in a different color. It seems that would be an improvement. GeoEvan (talk) 09:02, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

Yes, I agree with GeoEvan. And here's a direct reference in case any editor is doubting the existence of the observer status. SørenKierkegaard (talk) 21:01, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

I've restored the observer states to the article based on this information, regardless of the status of the map. 2606:6000:6793:7500:9854:8D3:6B7D:1DBC (talk) 05:48, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

The user User:Gaduse keeps persisting on trying to censor any mention of Baltic states in any Nordic-related articles with a clear agenda-driven mindset. Despite being explicitly told to use the talk page next time, the user ignored it and reapplied the same purge the user has applied multiple times in the past. As far as I know the user has not once participated in this talk page, instead using talks in the Nordic countries talk page as an excuse to repeat the same kinds of edits unilaterally, not understanding that the Nordic Council isn't a necessary equivalent to the Nordic countries. In the previous edit to the Nordic Council article, the user's edit reason claims that "This issue has been debated to death" despite no such consensus has been found in this talk page, and the article was left intact until this single user purged the relevant information. The user also has a long history of accusing the editors that try to have fair mention of Estonia or the Baltic states in such articles of "Estonian nationalism" and such (as an aside, I find that ironic since the user seems to be pushing some kind of Norwegian or pan-Nordic nationalism), and has been called out for personal attacks and "long xenophobic rant" (see "Fringe POV about Estonia and the Nordic countries becoming "a single unit" (one country?)") due to this kind of behavior.

How do we deal with this disruptive behavior? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2606:6000:6793:7500:CCCE:BA0B:AC24:EFF7 (talk) 04:08, 4 July 2018 (UTC) — 2606:6000:6793:7500:CCCE:BA0B:AC24:EFF7 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

EE-LV-LT have no formal standing in the Nordic Council. The NC ministers' offices in EE-LV-LT are more like embassies - in the sense that their existence does not signify membership in the organization. Hence the three countries should not be added to the map. Blomsterhagens (talk) 12:08, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

Estonian POV pushing

For the last year or so a single Estonian editor has tried to add excessive material pushing Estonian nationalist and fringe theories to articles related to the Nordic countries. He has managed to drown the talk page of virtually every single article related to the Nordic countries in endless, endless discussions about Estonia. The editor's attempts have been reverted and opposed and he has been called out for his disruption by probably a dozen or more editors, yet the editor persists. As seen above he has a long history of making personal attacks as well, and often falsely accuses other editors of being "xenophobic" merely for opposing the addition of fringe Estonian nationalist material to articles where the material doesn't belong (he has been called out by others for such false claims in the past as well). As we see above he also routinely tries to force editors to rehash the same old debates, ignores previous discussion and simply refuses to get the point.

We have already thoroughly debated whether Estonia holds "observer status" at the Nordic Council. The conlusion was that there is no evidence that such a formal observer status exists. Crucially, it isn't mentioned anywhere on the official website of the Nordic Council and Council of Ministers (I looked into this with an open mind, initially believing myself that the claim that Estonia held such status was correct). Instead sources were provided that demonstrated that observer status was in fact explicitly rejected.

Even if an observer status existed, it wouldn't belong in the section on members, in a way that portrayed the alleged "observers" (who aren't even observers) in a way that is visually almost indistinguishable from the actual members. We already have a section on cooperation with the Baltic states and other neighbouring countries and regions. That's where any mention of Estonia belongs. As it happens the article already includes an extensive discussion of the cooperation with Estonia and the other Baltic states. --Gaduse (talk) 05:49, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

To sum up the previous discussion on this issue:

• The Nordic Council's official website (norden.org), which is detailed/extensive and which can be relied upon, and which lists all official members, doesn't once mention any such status for the Baltic states
• Such a status isn't mentioned in the formal minutes of the council's sessions
• A high-quality source from 2002 states explicitly that such a status was rejected (David Smith (2002), Estonia: Independence and European Integration, p. 157, Routledge, Postcommunist States and Nations series, ISBN 9781136452208), with further sources also mentioning that the Baltic states' application to join the council was rejected
• A high-quality source from 2015 that directly discusses the issue at hand in-depth, viz. the institutionalized relations between the Baltic states and the Nordic Council, doesn't once mention the existence of any such status (T. Etzold, "Nordic institutionalized cooperation in a larger regional setting" (which includes a sub chapter on Nordic–Baltic cooperation), in Johan Strang (ed.), Nordic Cooperation: A European region in transition, Routledge, 2015, pp. 147–164)
• There is, so far, no other trace of any such status than (sometimes ambiguously worded) oneliners from irrelevant or peripheral works of little weight, that offer no sources/proof/details. At the very least it should be possible to prove when and how such a status was granted if it existed – particularly in light of the fact that we know the year the member states debated the matter and rejected the proposal explicitly.

In light of this the addition of the claim that Estonia holds observer status, without very good new sources that address the above concerns (such as the when and how issue), and that aren't oneliners from works about unrelated topics that merely mention the issue in passing, should be treated as a hoax. Of course I'm entirely open to the possibility that such sources may come to light (although they didn't during a lengthy previous discussion) or that the Baltic states may be granted observer status in the future. In that case it would be ok to amend the article, but any observers shouldn't be added to the members section in a way that made them very hard to distinguish from the member states, but rather in the existing separate section on cooperation with the Baltic states and others. --Gaduse (talk) 06:18, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

Gaduse, you have been in conflict with at least four different editors on these topics. This is not about a "single Estonian editor". Edit: The mention of an observer status does exist on the Norden site as well. Edit2: To the user with the address of " 2606:6000:6793:7500:CCCE:BA0B:AC24:EFF7" - please create a real Wiki account. You don't want to be accused of soapboxing later. Blomsterhagens (talk) 06:55, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

That's not the website of the Nordic Council, but of a local office of the council of ministers in Estonia. It does also not demonstrate that they hold any formal observer status in the sense that warrants their addition to the members section (instead of the section about cooperation with neighbouring countries) and discussed here, merely that they participated as guests in an informal manner. It doesn't answer the question about "when and how" they were formally given an "observer status" that is similar to a membership. The Nordic Council has hosted guests from many other countries in the past, even from countries such as Canada and the US. Please provide a better source. And no, you are the editor who have "been in conflict" with at least a dozen editors over your attempt to make this article and others unduly focused on Estonia and your various theories. --Gaduse (talk) 07:09, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

"The Nordic Council has ministers' offices in Estonia, Latvia & Lithuania" ; There's also the Nordic-Baltic Eight framework. Both of these signify a more close cooperation between the region than between the nordics and Russia for example. I'll ask around about a formal observer status though to end these topics. If there's no formal member status then of course EE-LV-LT should not be added to the members section. I've never added them there either. I'm against your personal / insulting attacks mostly. For example I've never added EE-LV-LT as members on this page. This has been done by several other editors. What makes you claim they are estonian? Why not latvian or lithuanian or norwegian? And why is it important what country someone is from at all? Group identity has been discarded as a metric of personal value since at least the early 20th century. How is this still relevant to anything? Blomsterhagens (talk) 10:14, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

Edit: I called the council’s office and according to the phone call, EE-LV-LT are not formal members of the nordic council. They are also not formal observers. They have no formal standing in the council. This concludes the topic on formal membership / formal observers for me. Countries that are not official members of the council should not be included in the members table or in the infobox. I have removed the NC local-lang lines for EE-LV-LT and Germany from the infobox as well. EE-LV-LT have, however, been informal observers on sessions each year. This is probably also the source of the confusion. I see nothing wrong with saying somewhere that EE-LV-LT have observed the sessions as informal observers. Blomsterhagens (talk) 11:04, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for your constructive initiative. This is really what I have been saying all along, after I initially looked into the matter (at first believing them to hold official observer status myself). It's perfectly fine to include material about them being present as informal observers, and of course having a close cooperation with the Nordic Council. It's also correct that the Nordic Council since the 1990s has prioritized cooperation with these three states, and that the cooperation with e.g. Russia has a somewhat different format. --Gaduse (talk) 11:35, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

I should clarify something. I am not Estonian, and I do not care about Estonian nationalism. I am merely someone that read a few articles and seeing you making agenda-driven edits. I am not that other person (or persons) that you seem to be accusing of Estonian nationalism (which, I told you to cut it out). I am a recent reader of this article that noticed your behavior of endlessly hunting down this single issue and making personal attacks on others. It's not a "single Estonian editor" against consensus; it's you, a single editor making charged statements and needs to cool down in numerous talk page discussions.

Relevant example: Observer status of the Baltic states — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2606:6000:6793:7500:E890:8C8F:3716:A37 (talk) 00:04, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

You are "merely someone" who has made no other edits, and who has come here merely to disruptively edit war and add a proven WP:HOAX to this article (that you knew to be a hoax, since you've apparently read the first discussion of it), and make ridiculous personal attacks in addition to your agenda-driven edits. Normally I don't engage with such editors, and you should consider yourself very lucky that you've not been blocked for your edits. Adding false information to Wikipedia articles is a serious matter. --Gaduse (talk) 03:36, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

Noting the other content in this talk pag as well, I trust your information on the phone call, /* Blomsterhagens */ and will nonetheless follow how things evolve in decades to come. The sovereign state of Estonia isn't Nordic nor Scandinavian for that matter. To be one, is to be integrated into a Nordic state most likely. I doubt Baltic articles have nice-to-know mentions about Nordic involvement neither. ✌️ ToniTurunen (talk) 11:45, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

Minority / regional languages on the infobox

The infobox currently has the Nordic Council names written in the majority national languages + Faroese. We should also add Greenlandic and Northern Sami. I don't know what the NC is called in those languages though. Blomsterhagens (talk) 11:23, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

Suggestion: Restructuring Article, separating Nordic Council of Ministers and Introducing Nordic Cooperation.

Hello.

This article is currently an amalgamation of the Nordic Council and the Nordic Council of Ministers. Wouldn't it be better to separate the information this article has on the Nordic Council of Ministers into its own article? The article on the Nordic Council of Ministers and this article can be summarized in a new article called Nordic Cooperation. This is the term that many involved with either the Nordic Council and Nordic Council of Ministers will use, however I realize that the term Nordic Council is popular in describing the leading institution of Nordic Cooperation.

I suggest that the information about the Nordic Council of Ministers be written in its own article, and also have an article about Nordic Cooperation which summarizes the articles on the Nordic Council and the Nordic Council of Ministers.

As a result: A new article will need to be created: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Nordic_Cooperation

Article page used for redirected would need to be completely overhauled: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nordic_Council_of_Ministers&action=edit

And this article will need some, perhaps large, editing: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nordic_Council

Johnwillem (talk) 11:38, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

Scotland

Given the impact of Brexit and a potential second Scottish independence referendum, should the relationship between the Scottish Government and the Nordic Council be mentioned in the article? A delegation from the Council has visited the Scottish parliament this year , and both sides are discussing the potential of future membership. Culloty82 (talk) 15:17, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

References

spelling

is "then-nonsovereign" a valid phrase? — jonas (talk) 16:40, 14 July 2024 (UTC)