Jump to content

Talk:Occupy San José

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Additional Info Needed

[edit]

Sources

[edit]

Additional "more reliable" sources will be added as soon as larger media organizations take notice. Thus far it has been documentation by the group executing the actions. Burleyc1 (talk) 07:46, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WP:CRYSTAL and WP:UPANDCOMING. Wouldn't it be better to wait to create the article until after it had been documented by third parties? VQuakr (talk) 07:58, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
there was supposedly something in the San Jose Mercury News but I can't find it on their website --Frantik (talk) 16:15, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
here's an actual article about the encampment, which might be shut down on friday --75.36.145.115 (talk) 08:57, 7 October 2011 (UTC
tv clip

Irrelevant items in timeline

[edit]

The first three items in the bulleted list in this article are irrelevant to Occupy San Jose specifically and are already covered in detail in related articles. If there is no opposition, I will go ahead and remove them in a day or two. Further, I do believe that prose is prefered over lists when it comes to articles but that is a separate discussion. MIC CHECK! ShakerSJC (talk) 18:20, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect discussion occurring for this article

[edit]

Rtnews template

[edit]

I've removed the Russia Today news template from the page, as it had raised concern because it pointed to a single trending news page, rather than a selection of trend pages, and after discussion in the appropriate places, it's easier to remove it than it is to add lots of other trend pages, as I don't know of any (don't have time to look). If there are any comments, concerns, or suggestions please reply on my talkpage, as I don't watch this page. Penyulap 03:41, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]