Talk:Onex Corporation

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

edit·history·watch·refresh Stock post message.svg To-do list for Onex Corporation:
Private Equity Task Force

Gtk-go-forward-ltr.svg Firm overview

  • Investment strategy
  • Investment geography
  • Offices, employees
  • Capital under management
  • Add an infobox: {{Infobox company}}
  • Add a company logo, if available: {{Infobox company}}

Gtk-go-forward-ltr.svg Firm history

  • Founding of the firm: founder(s), predecessor firm(s)
  • Investments: Sizeable or otherwise notable current or former investments
  • Fundraising: Investment funds, capital raised, fund vehicles, if possible
  • Other historical items: Controversies, spin-outs, name changes, geographic expansion, etc.

Gtk-go-forward-ltr.svg Portfolio investments

  • Listing of sizeable or otherwise notable current or former investments
  • Identify existing portfolio company articles and

Gtk-go-forward-ltr.svg References

  • Add newspaper or journal references to investments in portfolio companies
  • Add newspaper or journal references to new funds raised by the firm

Crystal Clear app kedit.pngJoin the Private Equity Task Force

See: Other PE Articles in need of attention

Page moved[edit]

I moved this page back from Onex Corp. to Onex Corporation as that appears to be the preferred form. The other possibility appeared to be ONEX Corporation, but that had no links to it. --Scott Davis Talk 23:36, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

POV tag[edit]

This concerns POV tag cleanup. Whenever an POV tag is placed, it is necessary to also post a message in the discussion section stating clearly why it is thought the article does not comply with POV guidelines, and suggestions for how to improve it. This permits discussion and consensus among editors. This is a drive-by tag, which is discouraged in WP, and it shall be removed. Future tags should have discussion posted as to why the tag was placed, and how the topic might be improved. Better yet, edit the topic yourself with the improvements. This statement is not a judgement of content, it is only a cleanup of frivolously and/or arbitrarily placed tags. No discussion, no tag.Jjdon (talk) 23:53, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

237,000 employees?[edit]

Somehow I doubt this private equity firm directly employs 237,000 people. Perhaps it's the sum of all the employees of all the companies Onex has a partial investment in? The reference for the number is broken. Robertbyrne (talk) 03:29, 7 January 2012 (UTC)


Why is there no mention of the Onex Corporation's connection to Canada's F-35 scandal?[1] Blind Donkey (talk) 03:47, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Yeah - I too think this should be in the article if there are more sources covering it substantially. Irakakiku (talk) 17:57, 4 May 2016 (UTC)