Talk:Over the Limit (2010)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Good article Over the Limit (2010) has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
Date Process Result
February 12, 2012 Good article nominee Listed
Did You Know
          This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject Professional wrestling (Rated GA-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon Over the Limit (2010) is within the scope of WikiProject Professional wrestling, an attempt to improve and standardize articles related to professional wrestling. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, visit the project to-do page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to discussions.
 GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Michigan / Detroit (Rated GA-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Michigan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Michigan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Detroit task force.
 

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Over the Limit (2010)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Dom497 (talk · contribs) 20:09, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

Hello, I will be reviewing this article and let the nominator know what needs to be improved if needed. GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality: (Quality is very good.)
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists: (Everything is perfect in this section.)
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources: (All the sources come from 3 different websites but still provide reliable info.)
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: (Every paragraph has at least one source/reference.)
    C. No original research: (No original research found.)
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects: (Covers all the details prior, during, and after the matches.)
    B. Focused: (Always stays on topic about the PPV.)
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias: (No bias found.)
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc: (Took a look at the article history and everything seems to be fine.)
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales: (All the images are properly sourced and copyrighted. Non-free images have fair use rationales.)
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: (Captions and pictures are good)
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail: Very good article and I am also very impressed...PASS!!!--Dom497 (talk) 03:49, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
    Thank you. Much appreciated. NiciVampireHeart 17:30, 12 February 2012 (UTC)