Jump to content

Talk:Oxley, Queensland

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Upper/Lower Oxley

[edit]

The IP editor insisting on adding a sentence about Upper and Lower Oxley needs to provide a reliable source to support their claim. - Shiftchange (talk) 06:32, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oxley has Inala to the south and it does flood there

[edit]

There have been a series of edits to this Oxley page removing references to the suburb of Inala, Queensland from the infobox. I invite anyone who does not believe that Inala is indeed an adjoining suburb to the south of Oxley to download the official Queensland Government boundaries of the suburbs using the Queensland Globe or to compare the Google maps for the two suburbs Oxley and Inala and check that they do adjoin along Boundary Road.

Similarly if anyone is removing material in relation to flooding in this suburb, I suggest they first check the flood data using the Queensland Government's interactive flood maps.

Please help to maintain the factual accuracy of Wikipedia. Kerry (talk) 21:15, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Actually no User:Jonnyoxley it is you who is incorrect. It is the Queensland Government who decides the boundaries of suburbs and localities in Queensland. Other editors, including me, have been sourcing the surrounding suburbs to Qld Globe. This includes data for the exact boundaries. This is a suburb reference for doing so and has been used for many places in Queensland. If you actually use that source you will see the current list is the most accurate. That is what matters, not what you might think is the truth. - Shiftchange (talk) 21:43, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Referencing

[edit]

What is going on with the strange referencing on this article? - Shiftchange (talk) 02:33, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

From what I can gather it's a technical limitation of {{refn}}. I've fixed it by using different code. --AussieLegend (✉) 13:12, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
thanks for the fix. It looks like something has changed under the hood, possibly in the ref processing, because the use of refn didn't change in this article, and the refn template itself hasn't changed, so the change must lie deeper. But using note is probably a better way to handle the situation in this particular case, so I guess all's well that ends well. It's not often you need to nest references. Kerry (talk) 14:32, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Oxley, Queensland. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:12, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned references in Oxley, Queensland

[edit]

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Oxley, Queensland's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "Census2021":

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. Feel free to remove this comment after fixing the refs. AnomieBOT⚡ 16:32, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Oxley,_Queensland&oldid=1201585539"