Talk:P. S. Krøyer's paintings of Marie

P. S. Krøyer's paintings of Marie has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
September 22, 2014	Good article nominee	Not listed
July 20, 2015	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on November 2, 2014.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that among P. S. Krøyer's paintings of his wife Marie is a double self-portrait (pictured) in which they painted each other?

Current status: Good article

Visual arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

Women artists

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women artists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women artists on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women artistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women artistsTemplate:WikiProject Women artistsWomen artists articles

Denmark Mid‑importance

	Denmark portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Denmark, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Denmark on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DenmarkWikipedia:WikiProject DenmarkTemplate:WikiProject DenmarkDenmark articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives

Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by when more than 2 sections are present.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:P.S. Krøyer's paintings of Marie/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: SchroCat (talk · contribs) 10:26, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'll pick this up and will start going through it shortly. - SchroCat (talk) 10:26, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@SchroCat: Thanks for accepting the review but I think the conflict in formatting preference for this article is likely to cause further difficulties between the main contributors. I made the edits initially which I believed would get it to pass GA but these edits were deemed poor by Belle especially. I don't want Ipigott in particular to feel compelled to make changes contrary to Belle's outlook on this and put him in a tight spot over this. I think the best solution would be to just leave the article as it is and move on peacefully. Personally I'd be quite happy to restore to my version and run with this as I was pretty sure my version before reverted would meet GA requirements, but I don't want to offend or push something through which I don't feel that strongly about. Yes, the article as it currently is has too many images in relation to text, but it's pretty harmless as a B class article so I'm prepared to leave an otherwise very decent entry alone and move on. Can I withdraw? ♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:28, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Doc, As nominator you can withdraw if you want to, just as anyone can re-Nom if they wish to. I've been holding off the review following a request on my talk page, and to allow the page to reach a level of stability. Are you sure you want to withdraw? If so, I'll put the process in motion. Cheers - SchroCat (talk) 19:52, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Definitely, yep. Thanks.♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:53, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi SchroCat. I think it might be useful to await a reaction from Belle before withdrawing it definitively. She is currently away for a week or so.--Ipigott (talk) 20:01, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ipigott, Sorry – I withdrew this a shade before your comment (both at 21:01). It can be re-nominated easily at any point once a consensus has been reached and the article is stable. Cheers - SchroCat (talk) 20:10, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]