Jump to content

Talk:Paracas culture

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 14 January 2019 and 25 April 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): EGreen697.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 06:06, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lack of Information

[edit]

I have done several searches via the web, and i haven't found much information on this civilization. I know they are unknown to most people, but maybe somoene could point me in the right direction to acquire info on them. On my searches there is a serious lack of information, and on some websites the civilization itself is over shadowed by the archeologists there.

re: "Lack of Information" - there also seems to be a lot of fictional accounting of just who the Pracas people are based on my own Google search, especially when it covers their mummies. I've noticed a strong current of White Nationalism utilizing unproven claims that it was an ancient band of Europeans who founded cultures outside of Europe (ie - Clovis points via the Solutreans, Paracas being the technological forebearers of Andean civilizations from Nazca to the Inca, as well as the "white" Quetzacoatl actually being an ancient European who taught the Olmec/Maya/Toltec's everything, and most notably the Tocharians and their Red/Blond mummies being responsible for ushering in the Bronze Age and Writing to the Chinese). Until the official Govt. reserachers studying the cultural artifacts, as well as the mummies, in Paracas release their findings I thinks we should wait and see. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.179.153.163 (talk) 17:32, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Is the Childress, Navarro & Foerster claim actual science?

[edit]

I'm a bit sceptical about citing a book published by a company, Adventures Unlimited Press, which according to its own website specialises in:

"Atlantic Studies, Alternative Health, Alternative Science, Ancient Science, Anti-Gravity, Conspiracy & History, Cryptozoology, Egypt & the Pyramids, Free Engery Systems, Geometry & Math, Holy Grail & Templar Studies, Lost Cities Series, Mysterious Phenomena, Mystic Travelers Series, Native American Studies, Philosophy & Religion, Strange Science, Tesla Technology, UFO's & Extraterrestrial and more." [[1]]

Is there anything published in more reputable sources which confirm the claims? If nothing else, it needs some improved references.

I've posted this question on the talk page of Artificial cranial deformation as well, so please visit that for comments.
Mojowiha (talk) 16:07, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
ADDENDUM
I've just realised that the Childress of the above mentioned book is the same David Hatcher Childress featured in the "Ancient Astronauts" series. Looking over his publications, this does not bode well for using him as a source.
Mojowiha (talk) 17:43, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Agreed. Childress work, especially published by his own company, are not reliable sources, and the general tone of the material was a problem with undue weight granted to a fringe viewpoint. Accordingly, I've cut the passage that refers to artificial cranial deformation in Paracas culture; it's possible that real science has been done on the topic, and if so, there's a place for that. But what was here isn't it. Squeamish Ossifrage (talk) 18:26, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
WRONG.. Volume of some skulls are clearly bigger than a normal one. It should be mentioned, not deleted --83.33.144.86 (talk) 21:27, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Paracas culture. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:11, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nazca Paracas Connection

[edit]

I added the connection. It's important for people to note these connections, that Paracas culture was the precedent for the Nazca culture to develop. I am a college student student at Washington University currently studying mesoamerican culture. Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Miles.burke (talkcontribs) 17:12, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: ARCN 111 Archaeology of the Americas

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 26 March 2024 and 3 June 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): MtD17, Krillieee, OpabiniaEnjoyer (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Minnesotaeducated, McGlacklin, Valin12345.

— Assignment last updated by Sak201 (talk) 12:59, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]