Talk:Peplos

Greece Mid‑importance

	Greece portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greece on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Classical Greece and Rome Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fashion Mid‑importance

	Fashion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women's History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comments

This is absurdly imprecise. At the very least this article must provide limiting dates for the use of the peplos in antiquity. The study of ancient dress is well advanced now, so there is surely something on the Roccos bibliography that could provide an answer. Is no one willing to do any research on the subject? Twospoonfuls 00:01, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Add a space: (The Caryatid statues show atypical drapery.) Should read "a typical drapery". (add a space) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.87.1.46 (talk) 19:16, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I fixed "atypical" by adding a space as required. TheDean (talk) 20:04, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes - and also self-contradictory. The garment is said to be 'tubular' but is also open at one edge. This must make it rectangular. I have changed the text accordingly, and wait to be corrected.Andrewg4oep (talk) 07:19, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Peplos. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120419145811/http://whowhatwear.com/website/full-article/trend-report-peplum-dresses/ to http://www.whowhatwear.com/website/full-article/trend-report-peplum-dresses/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:33, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]