Talk:Petrovaradin

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Petrovaradin article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Serbia High‑importance

	Serbia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Serbia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Serbia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SerbiaWikipedia:WikiProject SerbiaTemplate:WikiProject SerbiaSerbia articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

History

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

History

I had added the Peter the Hermit information from 1911. That was the only time I had seen that information listed. Olessi 22:35, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)

This information is not correct, since the city was called Petrikon long before 11th century. User:PANONIAN

Veljko Milković

Za anonimnog korisnika: vidim da si obrisao svoj komentar sa ove strane, ali sam ga u svakom slučaju video. Ja imam kod sebe jednu knjigu od Veljka Milkovića (Petrovaradin i Srem - misterija prošlosti, Novi Sad, 2003). Dakle, čovek je tu naveo relativno obimnu literaturu koju je koristio za pisanje knjige, a pošto sam uporedio istoriju Petrovaradina iz te knjige sa drugim izvorima koje imam, mogu da tvrdim da je korektno napisana. U tačnost drugog dela knjige u kojem je autor navodio i sopstvena istraživanja neću da ulazim, ali knjiga svakako ima vrednost bar što se tiče njenog istorijskog dela. Pošto tvrdiš da čovek pravi greške pri pisanju o Petrovaradinu, možeš li navesti na koje greške misliš? Poenta Vikipedije je da u referencama navede sve relevantne izvore o temi o kojoj je članak, prema tome, ako imaš još knjiga i linkova koje bi dodao ovde, slobodno to uradi, ali tvoj lični sukob sa nekim nije dovoljan razlog da njegovu knjigu brišeš iz referenci. PANONIAN (talk) 22:33, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Name

Ja samo znam da mađarski naziv za Petrovaradin dolazi od Sv Petra-tvrđava, Pétervárad Zato sam i stavio posle 1237, pošto se tada spominje mađarski naziv --Göran Smith 17:24, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mađarski naziv dolazi od Vizantijskog naziva, a od čega dolazi Vizantijski drugo je pitanje. PANONIAN (talk) 17:36, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ne, koliko lepo piše u mojoj mađarskoj literaturi ime je dobio po Svetom Petru, možda su mu to dali zato što je sličan naziv sa vizantijskim, ne znam. Ne bi stavili Svetog Petra na grv da nije. Ja samo znam odakle je dobio mađarski, a kapiram i onda nemački naziv --Göran Smith 17:41, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pa ta literatura očigledno nije imala pojma kako je grad dobio ime pa je pokušala da ga objasni sa svetim Petrom, ali ako se grad prvo zvao Petri-kon (sve do 12 veka), a posle toga Peter-varad, sličnost je očigledna i potpuno je jasno da je kasnije ime nastalo od prethodnog. A taj grb sigurno ne potiče iz 13 veka, već radije iz 18-19. PANONIAN (talk) 17:46, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Našao sam od kada tačno potiče grb - iz 1751, tako da je jasno da je sv. Petar na grb stavljen upravo zbog tadašnje pretpostavke o poreklu imena, što ne dokazuje da je pretpostavka tačna. Ime možda i nema nikakve veze sa svetim Petrom, jer sama reč "petar" znači "stena" (međutim nisam siguran da li to znači na grčkom ili aramejskom), tako da bi ime moglo jednostavno da znači "stenoviti grad". PANONIAN (talk) 17:59, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, to što znači na tim starim jezicima, ja govorim o mađarskom nazivu. Peter kao Petrova tvrđava. Sad, zašto su uzeli taj naziv... možda zato što je vec postojao slican naziv. A znaš da su mađari svaki naziv uglavnom menjali i prevodili na svoj jezik, pa onda bi i ovo promenili. Peter nije stena, vec petar, pa stoga je i na grbu kao zastitnik grada --Göran Smith 18:07, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pa rekoh ti je da je grb iz 1751 a mađarsko ime je iz 13 veka (te dve stvari nemaju veze jedna sa drugom). I očigledno je da Mađari jesu promenili naziv Petrikon na svoj jezik dodajući mu mađarsko ime "var" što znači grad, ali takođe je logično pretpostaviti da su i Vizantijci nazvali grad po svetom Petru. PANONIAN (talk) 18:13, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Varos je grad, a varad je tvrđava na mađarskom. Pa ok posle tu napravili grb. Ja samo znam iz literature da je Peter znači Petar, a ne kamen; i da je zaštitnik grada Sv.Petar.-.. ubaci, izbaci to, uporan sam više :P))) --Göran Smith 18:55, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Peter ne znači Petar. Peter i Petar su samo dve verzije biblijskog imena koje znači kamen ili stena (postoji i priča u bibliji o tome). I šta konkretno hoćeš da se ubaci i izbaci? PANONIAN (talk) 01:42, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, nek stoji kako hoćeš... pa ne mora ništa da se izbaci, ja ću samo ubaci teksta o kulturi i transportu. Pošto znam da imaš literaturu, ajd napiši nešto o tim četvrtima Petrovaradina i Kamenice, da ne bude sve crveno, pošto pravim novi, super šablon, a da ne bude baš sve crveno :))) --Göran Smith 01:51, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mape

Ne znam jel još neko primetio ali u ovom članku sada ima čak tri mape Novog Sada sa okolnim naseljima. Goranu se nije sviđala mapa koju sam ja nacrtao, pa je nacrtao novu, sad se korisniku Bože pravde ne sviđa Goranova, pa je i on nacrtao novu, a kladim se da neće mnogo proći dok se ne pojavi i četvrta mapa. Dakle koju ćemo od tih mapa zadržati u članku? PANONIAN (talk) 02:25, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

kako 3, ja vidim dve ... stara i ova nova, pink boje :) ... pa tu staru treba izbaciti, a ostaviti ovu interaktivnu i žutu, valjda ... idem sada spavati --Göran Smith 02:33, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bilo je ukupno 5 mapa, a tri su bile iste, pa sam 2 izbacio i sada ima samo tri različite. :)) PANONIAN (talk) 03:05, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:State-of-EXIT1.jpg

Image:State-of-EXIT1.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:14, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Petrovaradingrb.jpg

Image:Petrovaradingrb.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 14:15, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Petrovaradin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:58, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Vauban constructing Petrovaradin fortress

Is there a source for this claim? France was at war with Habsburg monarchy at precisely the point the article claims Vauban guided construction of Petrovaradin fortress 89.201.234.201 (talk) 20:35, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]