Talk:Philip P. Barbour

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Philip P. Barbour article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Politics: American Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by American politics task force (assessed as Low-importance).

QRpedia

This article is linked to by one or more organisations, using QRpedia. Statistics are available. For further information, please see WikiProject QRpedia.QRpediaWikipedia:WikiProject QRpediaTemplate:WikiProject QRpediaQRpedia articles

U.S. Congress High‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is about one (or many) person(s).

United States courts and judges Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States courts and judges, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States federal courts, courthouses, and United States federal judges on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United States courts and judgesWikipedia:WikiProject United States courts and judgesTemplate:WikiProject United States courts and judgesUnited States courts and judges articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Virginia C‑class High‑importance

	Virginia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Virginia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Virginia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirginiaWikipedia:WikiProject VirginiaTemplate:WikiProject VirginiaVirginia articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Start date?

The side panel says Barbour started on March 15th (two days before he left the District Court), but the article says "on May 7, 1836, the Senate approved the appointment of Barbour". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.2.60.187 (talk) 21:52, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Data behind page move

The full form of his name is the least common, particularly historically. Results from HathiTrust and Newspapers.com respectively: Philip P. Barbour: 8,201 (52%) and 1,334 (40%); P. P. Barbour: 3,179 (20%) and 1,866 (56%); Philip Barbour: 3,119 (20%) and n/a (most newspaper results don't refer to subject); Philip Pendleton Barbour: 1,313 (8%) and 119 (4%). He'd also easily be the primary for Philip Barbour, but the middle initial form seems clearly more common. The middle initial form is also used by Oyez, Brittanica, and the Senate. Star Garnet (talk) 01:58, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Narrowed reading of state's rights"

In the section "Constitutional legacy", the article states that Barbour applied "a narrowed reading of state's rights into the Constitution". However, the section then goes on to give examples of Barbour taking a more expansive view of states' rights than the Marshall jurisprudence. Shouldn't it say that he applied "an expansive reading"? Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 16:54, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]