Talk:PlayStation Vita system software

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Updates Not shown

I have notice more features edited / added that are not listed should I add them and where? 1tracfone (talk) 03:13, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to add them under the appropriate categories (i.e. PSN changes in firmware updates should be under the Network category for the specific update).
--GSK (talk ● evidence) 04:53, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

written from scratch or based on existing OS

Forgive my asking, but the operating system written from scratch or is it based on some existing operating system? E.g. PlayStation 4 system software is based on FreeBSD 9.0 User:ScotXW^t@lk 18:04, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sony have been using their own custom version of free/netBSD for as long as "i think" the PS2, it's basically a highly optimized version they maintain for each specific set of hardware, the Vita like the PS4 is an evolution of the work they've done in the past for the PS2/PS3 and many other Sony devices. (it is like Apple's OS X isn't 100% written from scratch but parts of it are) Markthemac (talk) 19:16, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Current and future releases confusion

Is there any particular reason 'PSVITA system software' and the 'PlayStation 4 system software' pages keep listing future update versions as if it was current?

The system software wiki pages for other consoles doesn't suffer from this confusion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.144.144.172 (talk) 02:48, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Article for deletion

Note that articles regarding "system software" of various game consoles such as this one is currently nominated for deletion. The reason for deletion by the nominator is WP:NOTCHANGELOG. If you have any opinion, please go to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xbox One system software and discuss it, thanks! --Cartakes (talk) 12:54, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information

Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not#Wikipedia_is_not_an_indiscriminate_collection_of_information

This includes long changelogs. Nukleon (talk) 13:09, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Every other version history page has conquered the evil that want to remove the version history, what makes this page so special that you can continue your power trip? 72.42.145.145 (talk) 09:07, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Because it's against the rules. EOD. Nukleon (talk) 17:13, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You didn't answer why other pages get to be free from your tyranny. What makes this one so special? 24.237.158.22 (talk) 18:34, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I can't be everywhere. Also "Tyranny". At least I'm not a coward who edits anonymously. Nukleon (talk) 21:31, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]