Jump to content

Talk:Point Stephens Light

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articlePoint Stephens Light has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 23, 2011Good article nomineeListed

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Point Stephens Light/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 21:53, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: none found

Linkrot: none found Jezhotwells (talk) 21:54, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Checking against GA criteria

[edit]
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    Prose and compliance with MoS fine, I made a few minor copy-edits.[1]
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    References are to Rs, all check out.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    Fine
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    OK, I think this adequately meets the WP:GACR, so I am happy to list this. I am sorry that you have had to wait do long. Jezhotwells (talk) 22:10, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks you! --Muhandes (talk) 22:23, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]