Jump to content

Talk:Pyrmont Bay ferry services

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Darling Harbour ferry services. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:44, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Darling Harbour ferry services. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:43, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal October 2020

[edit]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
The result of this discussion was merge the existing Pyrmont Bay ferry services into this article and rename this article to Pyrmont Bay ferry services. Techie3 (talk) 15:22, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I propose to merge Pyrmont Bay ferry services (the "upcoming F4") into this article ("past F4" prior to 2017) and rename the article to Pyrmont Bay ferry services ("combined article"), for a number of reasons:

  • Both F4 routes are almost similar, if not identical
  • Both titles are confusing, you do not know which one is which unless you read the lead paragraph or infobox. I have already placed an "about" tag at the top of each article.
  • There is no table of wharves in the past F4 article. The table in the upcoming F4 article can be placed before the length prose-y "History" section in the combined article.
  • The "Service" section in the upcoming F4 article is empty anyway.
  • The "Service" section in the past F4 article is largely unreferenced (about the fleet used). These may be removed to cut down length.
  • The outcome of the combined article will be similar to Airport & South Line, which talks about pre-2013 Airport and East Hills Line and the current T8 line, both of which are identical in route.

Marcnut1996 (talk) 02:46, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have also pinged users who have contributed content to the upcoming F4 and F9 articles in the last week. @Fleet Lists and Techie3:

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Update

[edit]

I have already merged the content from Pyrmont Bay ferry services into this article. Now, we just need an administrator to perform a page swap. Marcnut1996 (talk) 02:46, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]