Talk:Qastina

Palestine High‑importance

	Palestine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palestine, a team effort dedicated to building and maintaining comprehensive, informative and balanced articles related to the geographic Palestine region, the Palestinian people and the State of Palestine on Wikipedia. Join us by visiting the project page, where you can add your name to the list of members where you can contribute to the discussions.PalestineWikipedia:WikiProject PalestineTemplate:WikiProject PalestinePalestine-related articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Warning: active arbitration remedies

The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:

You must be logged-in and extended-confirmed to edit or discuss this topic on any page (except for making edit requests, provided they are not disruptive)
You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any edits related to this topic

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Further information

The exceptions to the extended confirmed restriction are:

Non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace only to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive.
Non-extended-confirmed editors may not create new articles, but administrators may exercise discretion when deciding how to enforce this remedy on article creations. Deletion of new articles created by non-extended-confirmed editors is permitted but not required.

With respect to the WP:1RR restriction:

Clear vandalism of whatever origin may be reverted without restriction. Also, reverts made solely to enforce the extended confirmed restriction are not considered edit warring.
Editors who violate this restriction may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offence.

After being warned, contentious topics procedure can be used against any editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process. Contentious topic sanctions can include blocks, topic-bans, or other restrictions.
Editors may report violations of these restrictions to the Arbitration enforcement noticeboard.

If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. When in doubt, don't revert!

Merge proposal

Oppose a merger to Malachi Junction. There are a series of articles on destroyed Palestinian villages. When they had a different name than that of the site/town built of the ruins thereafter, they should be covered in their own article. Further, why should a town with a long history of habitation be merged into an article on a traffic intersection? If anything, the article on the traffice intersection should not exist,~~as the information from there can be easily covered in the article on Qastina, in a section on the site today.~~ Thanks. Tiamut^talk 09:25, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Scratch my last comment on merger into Qastina. There is an article on Kiryat Malakhi and as Malachi Junction serves as a central bus station for the town, I have placed a merge proposal at Malachi Junction for merger into that article. Tiamut^talk 12:50, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ignoring the facts will not make them go away. Say "Qastina" to 99% of the people in Israel (including Palestinians) and they will say "a traffic intersection". -- Gabi S. (talk) 13:28, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have a source for that? Or is that your own personal opinion? Further, even if true, that does not mean that a separate article discussing Qastina's history as a Palestinian village cannot co-exist with articles on Kiryat Malakhi (and Malachi Junction, which really should be merged into the article on the town since it is the site of Kiryat Malakhi's central bus station). The fact that people refer to the intersection as Qastina, can be mentioned in both articles (if properly sourced). Merging an article on a Palestinian town into an article on a traffic intersection built upon its ruins though is inappropriate. Tiamut^talk 13:44, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I will try to find a source some day. Anyway, you're right: each of these deserves its own article. The junction article should mention the village that was there, and the village article should mention the junction that is there today. However, I don't agree about the merge you proposed: the Malachi junction (usually called "Qastina junction") is quite far from the Kiryat Malakhi city, and is an important traffic point, with many details irrelevant to Kiryat Malakhi (such as events that happened there, commercial development in the area, and so on). I will put my objection there as well. -- Gabi S. (talk) 19:56, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for coming around. As I said to Ynhockey, I won't push for a merger of Malachi Junction to Kiryat Malakhi if he thinks the article can be expanded. Given his recent additions to the article, and his outline of where he would like to take it next, I will remove the tag there too. Tiamut^talk 20:01, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

questions

Khalidi, 1992, does not have this place in the 1922 census, but I assume it is there as Kastina, with 406 Muslims. (Typo on Pal. Rem site? They write 604…a number which then decreases in the 1931 census -->not very likely.) Cheers, Huldra (talk) 08:49, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Qastina. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20081205081506/http://www.alnakba.org:80/villages/gaza/qastina.htm to http://alnakba.org/villages/gaza/qastina.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:56, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Qastina. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20090124212115/http://domino.un.org/maps/m0103_1b.gif to http://domino.un.org/maps/m0103_1b.gif

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:43, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]