|This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:|
Position-based quantum cryptography
- I guess there is some confusion arising in using (or not using) the following terms:
- "Position based quantum stuff" shouldn't take under account space-time?
- Just like Global navigation satellite systems?
- Or it's just me about to enter into some paradoxical conclusions?
- Whatever... thanks for the attention anyway.
- Have a nice day.
- I guess from the terms you mention, multilateration is closest (because quantum position verification uses the timing, not the angle (thus not triangulation)), and usually has four or more verifiers (thus not trilateration). But it is not really multilateration either, because it locates via the response times, while multilateration uses the differences in arrival times of the signal (i.e., communication is unidirectional).
- I am not sure what you mean by "taking into account space-time". Do you mean that the curvature of space-time needs to be taken into account? That would only necessary for long distance position verification, I believe (otherwise the errors are very small and can be ignored). (But curved spacetime can be handled, see http://eprint.iacr.org/2014/118/20140216:194504. Disclaimer: own research.)
State of the technique today?
It doesn't say what the state of the technique is today; at least not in the introduction part, and the rest of the article is just about specific parts of the technology. Shouldn't there be anything about that in the article? Is it just on the research level or is it actually being used? --Kri (talk) 16:14, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
- The article does read as if the techniques are up and running everywhere, whereas much of this is still theoretical. For QKD I have added a citation needed tag to say where this can be found. Myrvin (talk) 12:39, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
I have modified the entry about post-quantum cryptography. It was giving the impression that quantum cryptopgraphy could be broken by a quantum computer, which is of course not the case. The aim of post-quantum cryptography, in this usage of the term at least, is to find alternative _classical_ methods that are presumably secure against quantum computers. Quantum cryptography is obviously secure against adversaries with quantum computers, since those cannot violate the laws of quantum mechanics that are used to prove the security of QC.
Should be explained that if Bob and Alice live at oposite parts of the earth they will need a direct optical fiber connection to actualy use QC? Security affects just the optical cable transmission.--126.96.36.199 (talk) 15:51, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
- For QKD, many experiments involve photon travelling through air, if I'm not mistaken. Skippydo (talk) 04:39, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
- What I think the previous user means, is that in order to preserve the quantumstate of the messages, there needs to be a direct line between Alice and Bob. If there were like a router in between, wouldn't it change the quantum stae, because it needs to repeat the message? ie. it needs to resend it to another part of the network, therefore it has to create a new message, thus losing the quantum state. This is the reason why I came here aswell, because this has been bugging me too. If someone has an answer for this? 188.8.131.52 (talk) 14:40, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
The article's content is baloney
There is no such thing as quantum crypto. Quantum computing can be used to establish a connection between points, which is what the reference to key distribution is referring to. Quantum Physics, its laws (if you want to call them this) give its users an ability to be certain that a connection between two points is just that -- and that nobody has eavesdropped on that connection.
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Quantum cryptography. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20150205054629/http://www.quintessencelabs.com/ to http://www.quintessencelabs.com
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at
Archived sources still need to be checked