Talk:Rhona Cameron

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Comedy Low‑importance

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Scotland Low‑importance

	Scotland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

LGBTQ+ studies: Person

	LGBTQ portal This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles
	This article is supported by the LGBTQ+ Person task force.

It is requested that an image or photograph of Rhona Cameron be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Fair use rationale for Image:Rhonacameron.jpg

Image:Rhonacameron.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 02:25, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Rhonacameron.jpg

Image:Rhonacameron.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:29, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Potential copyvio

There is an awful lot which seems to be a straight lift from the subject's own website, and as such is a copyright violation. I've found independent sources for one such sentence, and rewritten it in my words. --Redrose64 (talk) 21:27, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Some more sources:

--Redrose64 (talk) 21:48, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rhona Cameron outing Sue Perkins...or perhaps not

For years, I have been mildly irritated by statements such as "Rhona Cameron outed her ex-girlfriend Sue Perkins as a lesbian in 2002 during Cameron's appearance on ITV's I'm a Celebrity...Get Me Out of Here!". This has been repeated in national newspapers so often (sometimes with the added suggestion that Sue was unhappy about the outing) that it is often taken as fact. But speaking personally, I am "sure" that I was aware of it "years" before I'm a Celeb... was aired in late August 2002. So I've finally got around to correcting it in Rhona Cameron#Personal life and Sue Perkins#Personal life.

But when I came to search the net for evidence, I found very little. There is a photo of them, looking very much a couple, and apparently happy to be seen as such, five months before the "outing"[1] (which I have used as a cite), and several "nod-nod-wink-wink-say-no-more" implications in what seems to be a somewhat catty and certainly unencyclopedic blog on 10 May 2000,[2] two years before; indeed the way the latter is written makes me wonder if its writer thought Sue might not yet be "out".

So in short, I have not found any reliable evidence, other than body language in a photo a mere five months before the "outing". Also, although those like me (based in London, with an interest in modern female comedy) knew that Sue Perkins was a lesbian much earlier, perhaps most of Sue's fans were unaware, and to them she would have been outed by Rhona's comments on I'm a Celeb... in late 2002.

So, my changes to the articles are somewhat lower-key than I initially intended, and even so I wonder if I should have left them untouched -- after all, no one else has seen fit to change the statements in the eight years since they were written. So in short, if anyone dislikes my changes, I would not be offended to be reverted (although please leave my minor changes earlier this evening, which disambiguated the wikilinks to the UK Series 1 I'm a celeb...). Enginear (talk) 21:55, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]