Jump to content

Talk:Robbie Middleby

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

50/50

[edit]

Ever heard of the neutrality rule anyone? We all have our opinions, the fact that people to this day are still divided on if it was a foul or not makes it 50/50! There are good arguments on both sides, personally I'd rather have it that Leijer was standing his ground but I'm not stupid enough to do that. Mr. Poodles 05:46, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well i totally disagree that it was anything but a clear foul, and to say it was a 50/50 challenge, is too lenient on the actions of Adrian Leijer in my opinion.
Did you understand anything there? Please, what you're putting in IS Bias, your putting it out from the neutral pov. Mr. Poodles 03:57, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
For the record there was nothing 50-50 about it, I don't think anyone that was a Victory fan ever saw it as Leijer "standing his ground". But, seriously, this isn't the place to discuss it. The way the article was written seemed unnecessarily roundabout and overly focused on vilifying Leijer so I've changed it and sourced it to something everyone can agree on (I think). If anyone feels that it wasn't an "incident" or that it wasn't "off-the-ball" or that it wasn't "controversial" feel free to argue your point. -[dM] 13:41, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Robbie Middleby. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:00, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]