Talk:Robert Wishart
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Guardians and Queens
[edit]I really do not want to make too much of this, and I have seen from the relevant talk page just how much intellectual energy has been devoted to Margaret's exact title and status; but I think it is a reasonably safe assumption that Wishart-and others- would have continued to act as Guardian even afer her inauguration as queen, considering her age. The amendment on this point is therefore misleading. I would have edited accordingly; but having no wish to cause upset or offence will allow this to stand for a day or two for comment. Thereafter it will stand as justification. Rcpaterson 23:19, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
- I'm sure you're right (unless, speculating, Bek had been appointed Regent by her father-in-law-to-be). Still, Wishart would surely have been on the regency council. Angus McLellan (Talk) 23:34, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
I have now made what I think is a neutral, and open-ended, amendment. Rcpaterson 21:59, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
Categories:
- C-Class biography articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- C-Class Christianity articles
- Low-importance Christianity articles
- WikiProject Christianity articles
- C-Class Catholicism articles
- Low-importance Catholicism articles
- WikiProject Catholicism articles
- C-Class Medieval Scotland articles
- Low-importance Medieval Scotland articles