Talk:Roses (The Chainsmokers song)
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Roses (The Chainsmokers song) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
|
Requested move 23 April 2017
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Consensus not to move. Yashovardhan (talk) 04:29, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
- Roses (The Chainsmokers song) → Roses (Chainsmokers song)
- Until You Were Gone (The Chainsmokers and Tritonal song) → Until You Were Gone (Chainsmokers and Tritonal song)
- New York City (The Chainsmokers song) → New York City (Chainsmokers song)
- Don't Let Me Down (The Chainsmokers song) → Don't Let Me Down (Chainsmokers song)
- Inside Out (The Chainsmokers song) → Inside Out (Chainsmokers song)
- Closer (The Chainsmokers song) → Closer (Chainsmokers song)
- Paris (The Chainsmokers song) → Paris (Chainsmokers song)
- The One (The Chainsmokers song) → The One (Chainsmokers song)
– Per Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/The Beatles and Wikipedia talk:WikiProject The Beatles/Archive 8#Parenthetical disambiguators, the definite article should be omitted for disambiguation. Articles in Category:The Beatles albums and Category:The Beatles songs use (Beatles album) and (Beatles song) for disambiguation, not (The Beatles album) or (The Beatles song). Don't Let Me Down (Beatles song) is not at Don't Let Me Down (The Beatles song). I fail to see why the Chainsmokers, another music group, should be treated any differently. feminist 09:51, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose - This dubious decision [1] cannot be seriously used as a credible argument for changes to other articles. "Lower case argument wins hands down - although I don't really feel too strongly either way, personally" just about typifies the level of opinions expressed for lowercase. The closer appears to have ignored the weight of an argument and gone for raw numbers as the decider. Tiptoethrutheminefield (talk) 15:55, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
- Support. There is precedent for this with the Beatles and use of the article like this before an attributive noun is ungrammatical (e.g., "I am listening to ′Roses′, a The Chainsmokers song," is not idiomatic.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by AjaxSmack (talk • contribs) 18:10, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
- 'I am listening to 'Roses' by The Chainsmokers" is most likely to be said by any person in any situation. © Tbhotch™ (en-2.5). 00:43, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose. Per [2] © Tbhotch™ (en-2.5). 00:43, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose - per reasons stated. Aleccat 19:38, 29 April 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose: Per arguments stated above. Raritydash (talk) 21:44, 29 April 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Roses (The Chainsmokers song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151222171749/https://itunes.apple.com/us/album/roses-feat.-rozes-remixes-ep/id1055434022 to https://itunes.apple.com/us/album/roses-feat.-rozes-remixes-ep/id1055434022
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20161228174302/http://oe3.orf.at/charts/stories/2749413/ to http://oe3.orf.at/charts/stories/2749413/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:32, 24 May 2017 (UTC)