Talk:Roxanne (The Police song)

No more drinking game

This is the second time in a week that I've removed details of an eponymous drinking game from this article. In fact, the drinking game had its very own article, but it was nominated for deletion and received a unanimous delete vote - the stand-alone article is now gone, and this article should have no mention of the drinking game.

Frat boys, if you must, just put a sentence about it in the drinking games article. That's the only place it conceivably belongs, and even then only with a cite.

Look here for the results of the delete vote: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Roxanne_%28drinking_game%29_%282nd_nomination%29 BlackberryLaw 17:05, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ah here now, please please tell me how a line in an artic monkeys song or the fact it was in the office is significant but not a game played by millions the world over?? I'm fascinated, this isn't some site to shoot down genuine aspects of life for people just because they're school-going, just because you feel it is below you(which you must by using frat boys) doesn't mean it shouldn't be included.One line can hardly hurt.plokt 21:17, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I completely agree with the guy above this is a real drinking game and it is a reference to Roxanne therefore it needs to be in the article.Parralax 23:12, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The reason for the deletion of the Roxanne (drinking game) article was due to the lack of notability and because, from what I've read here at Blackberrylaw's link (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Roxanne_%28drinking_game%29_%282nd_nomination%29) it was wrongly described, in that it was stated a whole drink was consumed on the indicated lyrics and not just a sip. The addition of the drinking game information to this article is very much like that included on Withnail and I#Drinking game which is not at all questioned. I see no reason not to to include a small section within this article. Ej159 (talk) 13:56, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge

I think that this article and Roxanne (drinking game) should be merged, as the latter doesn't warrant it's own article, and if it was reworded it could fit into this one nicely. Master of Puppets ^{Giant Enemy Crab!} 20:22, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Moulin Rouge

Is there anyone who knows El Tango de Roxanne from Moulin Rouge? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 208.127.72.124 (talk) 00:58, 2 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Yes, I believe Roxanne features in the film and musical of Moulin Rouge and should be mentioned here, but where? Sterry2607 (talk) 11:27, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Roxannesingle.jpg

Image:Roxannesingle.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:48, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That song ruined my life? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.125.168.120 (talk) 06:56, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Genero Muiscal

No entiendo porqe le ponen new wave si es claramente regge/rock tambien con la de can't stand losing you —Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.66.35.43 (talk) 07:02, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Banned ?

The Police article says this song was banned by the BBC for graphic lyrics. Was it ? On just the first release or both ? -- Beardo (talk) 03:33, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

48 hours

I remember Eddie Murphy singing Roxanne by The Police in the movie 48 hours with Nick Nolte. He is in a jail cell sort of singing it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:2000:69A2:E000:60C0:87F8:97AE:684 (talk) 03:16, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Eddie Murphy does sing along to the song in his very first scene in 48 Hrs, his first movie, before Nick Nolte grabs his Sony Walkman. Someone in the History has claimed the song was in the sequel, Another 48 Hrs, but it's actually in both films and the use in the sequel is a reference to the first film. It's a fairly famous scene and it certainly deserves a mention so I added it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C5:D620:8500:FDE8:2729:5029:F631 (talk) 03:06, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 2 December 2019

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: page moved (non-admin closure) ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 06:52, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Roxanne (song) → Roxanne (The Police song) – I apologize if my move of the page came as a shock to anyone a couple weeks ago, but now, as the Arizona Zervas song of the same name has officially hit the top five on the Billboard Hot 100, I think it is time. I realize this song has been a classic for the last 41 years since its release, but the two songs are from two different decades where based on chart positions, neither song is dominant over the other. JE98 (talk) 22:24, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@CambridgeBayWeather: Since you reverted my move, I invite you to give your opposing opinion here. JE98 (talk) 22:25, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support - ambiguous disambiguation is not disambiguation at all Red Slash 23:45, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support per WP:INCDAB. The relative success of either is irrelevant since both already have to be disambiguated anyway. Fix links and then redirect (song) to the disambiguation page. -- Netoholic @ 02:56, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
No discussion surprised that CambridgeBayWeather, who is an admin, would delete Talk:Roxanne_(Arizona_Zervas_song) per A9, see discussion there, after the song had charted and revert an apparently uncontroversial move done per disambiguation guidelines. 14 Nov Roxanne (Arizona Zervas song) was already at WP:NSONG. In ictu oculi (talk) 08:59, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Very clear primary topic. We have made exceptions to WP:INCDAB in the past for reasons of common sense (see last paragraph of INCDAB for the validity of this) and this is another perfect example. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:44, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support per WP:INCDAB and numerous other examples. There is rarely a reason to have a title with a disambiguation be a "primary" (other than ego-reasons, there really is almost zero benefit to it). This helps both readers using the search engine and also editors who may incorrectly link to this while meaning something else (as a bot will leave them a message on their talk page, and if enabled, the link will show as a dab link). --Gonnym (talk) 21:21, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support due to numerous other examples. Here is an example of this: The Power of Love (Frankie Goes to Hollywood song) vs. [[1]]. Methyllithium (talk) 02:20, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Weird example, given the Jennifer Rush song is just as notable as the FGtH song and there is therefore no primary topic. This is certainly not the case here. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:44, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. Neodop (talk) 00:13, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support. I was going to oppose, but then looked at the page views. Especially since INCDAB requires a higher standard to declare a PDAB to be primary, the Police song is no longer clearly the primary topic. --В²C ☎ 18:06, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

in pop culture

I think there should be a section dedicated to its references in tv and movies. EX: it was used in the American tv show Community in the episode Remedial Chaos Theory. Jerry Steinfield (talk) 05:16, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cover by Fall Out Boy

I recently listened to Fall Out Boy's first album and I was surprised to hear their cover of the song. I am shocked to see that it's not mentioned here? Does it not count as a cover? TheForsaken99 (talk) 17:45, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The guideline WP:SONGCOVER sets a high bar to inclusion. If the media commented specifically on this cover version then we can summarize what they said. Binksternet (talk) 17:51, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Cover by Lacey Sturm

Lacey's solo album Life Screams features an excellent live cover for Roxanne. 66.52.238.228 (talk) 21:13, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If an uninvolved WP:SECONDARY media source praises the cover then we can list it. The guideline at WP:SONGCOVER sets a high bar for cover versions. Binksternet (talk) 22:08, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]