Jump to content

Talk:Royal Malaysian Navy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Kasturi Class

[edit]

I'm not very much into ships, but why are the Kasturi Class -Corvettes are in the Frigate and not the Corvette Category? --134.76.63.1 21:20, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kapal DiRaja

[edit]
Kapal DiRaja: Would a Malay-speaker help out ? Does not this mean "Royal Ship" as opposed to "His Majesty's Ship "?—Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.248.225.148 (talk • contribs)
the literal translation of Kapal DiRaja is as you put it Royal Ship, however a purposive interpretation is His Majesty's Ship.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.47.167.2 (talk • contribs)

HMMS or KD?

[edit]
The RMN's ships now carried the prefix Her Majesty's Malayan Ship (HMMS).
As far as I know the prefix is KD. Why need to tanslate it to HMMS? 218.111.3.54 18:46, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, that was before independence , seems the article did not emphasised on the KD (Kapal Di-Raja) term used after independence (with the Royal usage with respect to the Malaysian King not the British Monarch). But it is there somewhere in the article, have to rearrange it clearly I guess.

--Bukhrin 05:11, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I realize about that, but I think the RMN written there refer to Royal Malayan Navy, (back at that time Malaya was still under British...and the 'Royal' refer to the Queen, not the the Malaysian King.

Possible source for expasion

[edit]

The fourth chapter of Tiger Territory, by Ian Pfennigwerth, focuses on the creation and early years of the RMN. It may be of use to regular contributors to this article. -- saberwyn 01:48, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Pfennigwerth, Ian (2008). Tiger Territory: The untold story of the Royal Australian Navy in Southeast Asia from 1948 to 1971 (Google Books). Kenthurst, NSW: Rosenberg. ISBN 9781877058653. OCLC 191754413. Retrieved 8 April 2009.

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page

[edit]

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

  • http://www.naval-technology.com/projects/lekiu/
    Triggered by \bnaval-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist
  • http://www.naval-technology.com/projects/kasturi-class/
    Triggered by \bnaval-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist
  • http://www.naval-technology.com/projects/laksamana/
    Triggered by \bnaval-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist
  • http://www.naval-technology.com/projects/kedah-class-patrol/
    Triggered by \bnaval-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 13:33, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Can someone please include the submarine rescue vessel MV Mega Bakti in the list of RMN assets? I'm afraid if I try it, I'll mess up the formatting. Thanks! Link here : http://www.keppelom.com/en/content.aspx?sid=2580

 Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 20:05, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned references in Royal Malaysian Navy

[edit]

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Royal Malaysian Navy's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "stats":

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 07:35, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Listing of the Kasturi-class as frigates

[edit]

Similar to the IP-user comment on top of this talk page from back in 2007, I found that all reliable sources, including Jane's Fighting Ships, list the Kasturi-class ships as corvettes, not as frigates. Therefore I change the information in this article according to those sources. DavidDCM (talk) 15:17, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Royal Malaysian Navy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:11, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Royal Malaysian Navy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 21:32, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Royal Malaysian Navy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:05, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Royal Malaysian Navy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:04, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rank Insignia Inaccuracy

[edit]

There are possible inaccuracies in the rank insignia of the ratings (OR-1 to OR-7). I noticed they were replaced by "new" rank insignia on 28 August 2019 that have chevrons, however I believe that there may have been a misunderstanding.

The chevrons in the navy (in accordance with Commonwealth navies traditions) stand for years of service as opposed to an indication of rank. For example, one chevron indicates 5 years of service and so on. Both insignia the so-called "new" and "old" are correct, however, the insignia with the chevrons is worn on the left sleeve while the one with the star or anchor is worn on the right sleeve. Usually, the insignia worn on the right sleeve is used to denote the role of the sailor and the rank. As far as I am aware, this has always been the case and there has been no change of rank insignia in the Royal Malaysian Navy as of the 26th of September, 2019. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yiheng16 (talk • contribs) 02:17, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Royal_Malaysian_Navy&oldid=1210138797"