A fact from Rumbo Recorders appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 30 October 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Professional sound production, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sound recording and reproduction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Professional sound productionWikipedia:WikiProject Professional sound productionTemplate:WikiProject Professional sound productionProfessional sound production articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rock music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rock music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rock musicWikipedia:WikiProject Rock musicTemplate:WikiProject Rock musicRock music articles
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Overall: Article is new enough, going live on 29 September. On its initial release it was over 1.8k bytes of text. Not all text is verifiable to a reliable source, including technical information about Studio A, and Studio C. Hook is cited. Hook is interesting enough for random trivia, but nothing that wows me. No images used. Nominator/creator has less than 5 DYKs. Please continue to work on this article. RightCowLeftCoast (Moo) 00:36, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. I have corrected the formatting of numerous references that was preventing their displaying correctly. I also added a few more details.synthfiend (talk) 13:31, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I have added an existing reference to a sentence at the end of a paragraph which lacked a reliable source for verifiability. This should resolve the issue found above. A new reviewer is needed to pass this nomination.--RightCowLeftCoast (Moo) 14:18, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
seems like that issue was solved. @RightCowLeftCoast: it's always fine to ask for a second opinion, but I don't think there was a conflict of interest or anything on that one. Adding a reference, especially one already in the article, doesn't disqualify you from finishing the review imo—reviewers make small changes to the article all the time instead of asking the nominators to do it for them. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 03:49, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]