Talk:Russian Chapel (Vršič Pass)

Military history: Memorials / Russian & Soviet / World War I

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military memorials and cemeteries task force
	Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force
	World War I task force

Eastern Orthodoxy Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Eastern Orthodoxy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to the Eastern Orthodox Church. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. You may also want to look at the current collaboration of the month or the project's notice board.Eastern OrthodoxyWikipedia:WikiProject Eastern OrthodoxyTemplate:WikiProject Eastern OrthodoxyEastern Orthodoxy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Slovenia Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Slovenia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Slovenia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SloveniaWikipedia:WikiProject SloveniaTemplate:WikiProject SloveniaSlovenia articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Slovenia to-do list:

Here are some tasks you can do (watch):

Requests: Jože Tisnikar (sl), Protestant Reformation in the Slovene Lands (sl), Metlika black (sl)
Wikify: Russia–Slovenia relations
Unreferenced: Inner Carniola, Litostroj, Pavel Golia, Predjama Castle
Cleanup: Edvard Ravnikar, Škofja Loka, Inex-Adria Aviopromet Flight 1308
Expand: Education in Slovenia
Stubs: Ajdovi žganci, Čop Street, Omar Naber, Radenska
NPOV: Gregorij Rožman, Siddharta (band)
Portal maintenance: Update News, Did you know, announcements, and suggest Selected article and picture
Help assess the quality of 63 unassessed articles
Take/Add requested photographs

On 31 July 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved from Russian Chapel on the Vršič Pass to Russian Chapel (Vršič Pass). The result of the discussion was moved.

Modern image: seeking input/consensus[edit]

Regarding this edit, seeking input/consensus from other editors on whether Image 1 or Image 2 (or some other modern image from Commons) is more appropriate. My personal opinion is that Image 1 is poor quality: the bottom of the building is cut off and it is distorted, with the right tower curved and the cross cut off at the top). Doremo (talk) 14:15, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Doremo, I certainly prefer Image 2 or even better, a new photo if any visual modificiation to the chapel has recently taken place. Image 1 has a distorted perspective and is thus not suitable. Please note that Image 2 and other images of this chapel will soon be deleted on Commons since they will only meet the Commons criteria in 2036 (as per the cut-off of 120 years for orphan architectural works in Slovenia). You are welcome to transfer the image here in the meantime. Please use {{FoP-USonly}} and another copyright tag (e.g. {{cc-by-sa-4.0}}) for such cases. --TadejM ^{my talk} 01:22, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 02:21, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 31 July 2023[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. No objections to the move after two weeks, appears uncontroversial even with one support !vote. (closed by non-admin page mover) The Night Watch (talk) 23:31, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Russian Chapel on the Vršič Pass → Russian Chapel (Vršič Pass) – The established name is solely Russian Chapel, without the epithet 'on the Vršič Pass' TadejM ^{my talk} 00:20, 31 July 2023 (UTC)— Relisting. —usernamekiran (talk) 16:56, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support. The current name is a direct translation from Slovene. Eastern European languages often name sites and structures like this, but it is not normal or natural English and direct translation is not ideal, even if that was its formal name. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:02, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I was gonna close as "moved" given that there is an unanimous consensus, but this was relisted after the support !vote and no other !votes came in. usernamekiran, is there a reason this should've been relisted and can this be closed as moved? CLYDE ^{TALK TO ME}/_{STUFF DONE} 19:17, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

@ClydeFranklin and The Night Watch: Hi. After the first week, there was one only one support (+one proposer). Under such circumstances it is generally a good idea to relist the discussion for a second week to let other editors contribute, rather than having comments like "we didn't get to participate", and/or getting another RM soon (I have seen such scenarios in the past). —usernamekiran (talk) 05:53, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]