Talk:Zinacantepec

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

Mexico Low‑importance

	Mexico portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mexico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mexico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MexicoWikipedia:WikiProject MexicoTemplate:WikiProject MexicoMexico articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was the subject of an educational assignment that ended on 22 February 2008. Further details are available here.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on San Miguel Zinacantepec. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070927205719/http://www.e-local.gob.mx/work/templates/enciclo/mexico/mpios/15118a.htm to http://www.e-local.gob.mx/work/templates/enciclo/mexico/mpios/15118a.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 04:17, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on San Miguel Zinacantepec. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070328224939/http://www.inegi.gob.mx/est/contenidos/espanol/sistemas/conteo2005/localidad/iter/ to http://www.inegi.gob.mx/est/contenidos/espanol/sistemas/conteo2005/localidad/iter/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:47, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on San Miguel Zinacantepec. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100111012728/http://museovirreinal.com/ to http://museovirreinal.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:38, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on San Miguel Zinacantepec. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100919035015/http://colonial-mexico.com/Central%20Mexico/zin.html to http://www.colonial-mexico.com/Central%20Mexico/zin.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:18, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 31 July 2021

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved to Zinacantepec. The municipality seems to be the main topic of the article, and the town mentioned just in passing. No such user (talk) 12:52, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

San Miguel Zinacantepec → Zinacantepec – San Miguel Zinacantepec is the name of the municipal seat. The article is primarily about the municipality as a whole, whose official name is just Zinacantepec.[1][2][3] Cobblet (talk) 17:12, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, the references agree with this point of view. Hughesdarren (talk) 04:33, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I am just learning how to change wikipedia articles. I am finding that many of the English articles for municipalities were merged with cities because some people don't know that municipalies in Mexico are counties. I am trying to find a the best way to fix this. This one was previously moved to the page for the city of San Miguel Zinacantepec. I am working on a database for places in Mexico and referincing wikipedia articles and it is frustrating when the articles are wrong. It has caused many errors in our database from other people misunderstanding.
@KitChristensen7: I don't think it's necessarily an issue of writers not knowing the difference between localities and municipalities. And the analogy with US counties is not perfect, because there is usually only one tier of local government in Mexico (municipalities) as opposed to two in the US (counties and municipalities). The town of San Miguel Zinacantepec does not have a governing body separate from that of the larger municipality of Zinacantepec. When an article such as this one says, "Zinacantepec is a town and municipality in Mexico State", I read this not to mean that the town and municipality are coextensive, but merely that they share the same name. At the same time, I understand that this phrasing is unclear at best and confusing at worst, so your continued efforts to clean this up are most welcome. Cobblet (talk) 05:16, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Cobblet: This municipality only shares part of the name, not San Miguel. They do not share the same geographical boundaries. Every locality in Mexico outside of CDMX is in a municipality. In other places municipalities are incorporated cities and not a level of govornment in most places, which is different. They are distinct and should be treated as such. With my work in a database if they are treated the same then if it only says "Zinacantepec" I don't know if it is the town or one of the other 95 localities in the municipality. That is my concern. The municipalities vary, but I see no reason to treat them separatly the way that they should be or in some cases where they may be the only city, like Saltillo, at least have it worded to not confuse the two. Thanks for responding.

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.